I actually tried...
I need to check this more often and write shorter posts...
GIEFF pointed a couple of things in a meta search and camn reacted very strongly calling it a crapcase and voting GIEFF when it was not
camn wrote:PS, GIEFF..... you have already totally proven that you don't really understand how to use Meta.... so any meta arguments you might bring are pretty worthless, IMO.
quotes like this one ^^ make camn sound really strange because she doesn't seem to imply she think GIEFF is scummy. It's more like he pissed her off or something.
camn wrote:You have no idea what town-camn would do.
You have proven this.
Everything you have written is insane speculation... you need to be more clear.
Are you asking where I was this weekend?
camn... why are you acting like empking? like a stubborn kid that knows deep inside that he is wrong? You over reacted to some points he made.
He said you looked like buddying and he metaed you...
You totally overreacted and voted him but never called him scummy.
#185 is lame camn... what are those 2 crapcases you claim that GIEFF made? What does your birthday have to do with the fact that you posted but were most unhelpful and odd?
GIEFF wrote:Everything I have written is speculation, but calling it insane does not make it insane, no more than calling my posts crapcases is enough to make them crappy. Yet once again, I feel that your focus is not on calling me scummy - you only call my cases crap because you want to protect yourself
QFT. You don't seem to find him scummy. Yet, a vote.
187: Camn... You're REALLY starting to give me Emp-vibes... what's wrong with you?
"When I totally refuted and destroyed your case (in 149), I asked YOU some questions.. which you have totally ignored. "??? what the fuck??? You say nothing here... You just cover your ears and yell...
"YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG!"
#189: So Kai? Not one suspicion?
Benmage wrote:Uhh, okay wow…uhm hop of his dick. The caps adds to anything?
They express my annoyance.
Benmage wrote:3-4 votes in this large game isn’t a dreadful wagon, so chill.
I know it's not THAT big but it does set a tendency that I'm trying to avoid. Look how some people already thought this in terms of:
Today's topics:
1) BM vs Alexhans
2) GIEFF vs Camn
Wooooooh!! let's ignore everything else!!!!
My point is that if you waggon someone then it's starts to be an acceptable lynch at the end of the day.
And where the hell is Mastin by the way? I'm expecting him to post. He was active on site...
Benmage wrote:alexhans wrote:Zachrulez wrote:Alexhans, why so upset about Mastin being bandwagoned?
I see no reasons for voting him but atacking the first one who makes something to move the game. He is acting as he usually does and his auto-clearing doesn't seem scummy to me. Just mastin's personality. I should check a game where he is scum to have more information but from what I have now he is not scummy.
I'm not liking a fast waggon on an active, pro town player...
We should worry about those who DONT post or post null opinions and keep discussing everything...
Acting the same way one does when town doesn’t clear them.
??? explain...
Benmage wrote:Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Agreed. Ironically, Alex mentions M91 as solid reason for NK speculation, noting that Sens’ N0 death wasn’t random. Except the other scum group, which I was a part of, removed everyone we played with from the player list and then randomly killed from that list N0 as to throw off townies trying to do this exact kind of speculation.
WOW*****can we lynch Mastin yet?
Read my Quicktopic quotes and tell me if all the kills are random and who has made his point regarding the killing motives.
Benmage wrote:First this whole ‘big post’ seems like alex took some chill pills and may be trying to relax off the MASTIN is confirmed town mentality, which is an odd quick switch.
let's clear something up...
You think I think Mastin is confirmed town?
Did you read the NutSoCaps? Read it again... maybe you'll see that I NEVER ignore the possibility that he may be scum... I was just annoyed at an unreasoned (IMO, and I still dont see much besides he's apparent clearing himself) quickwaggon and the fact that it was built upon the most active player at the time. Wich is something I hate about mafia. When active players get attacked for being active and scum may safely glide around.
Benmage wrote: Also my vote forced? What the fuck does that even mean. Are you suggesting that the 3-4 of us on Mastin all plotted to vote quickly and wagon him. No scum would ever do that. Don’t be an idiot.
If you haven't fully understood what I mean. Don't call me an idiot.
Vote Forced means that you try to make your vote sound convinced and strong when you really don't feel it. You don't even talk much about mastin in the post where you voted him but still did at the end... You jumped on a full growing waggon without much thought? cool. Very pro town.
motives for a mastin vote from Benmage:
a) Mastin may be scum and may be acting ilogically
b) He's going after Battle Mage.
c) ...
d) there's not even a c) man... do you expect a d)?
later, you develop on matin that he seemed to try to auto-clear himself.
And that's it...
Now you feel that those points are good enough to push his vote.
GIEFF wrote:Simply saying "I like you" isn't enough to be buddying, in my opinion.
I agree.
Camn wrote:
I was not reacting particularly strongly, in my opinion.
Camn... you voted him... and acted all "Angry"... Any you keep ad homin him with no explanation when all the cases you quoted as you buddying as town were all subject to opinion.
Camn wrote:I made no Joke. You attest I made a joke.. but I see no smiley face. Your assumption is wrong. Probably it is just a lie. Thus, again, you are simply trying to change the subject, and it doesn't deserve anything but my scorn and disdain.
riiiiight... Because we know that you only make jokes with smileys beside them...
I'm so much more on GIEFF's side of this conversation... You have been completely stubborn, ilogical and evasive.
@Camn: Who do you think is scum? (Besides GIEFF if you actually think he is)
VP Baltar wrote:Benmage wrote:I fully endorse the battle mage wagon.
I was reading you as being more critical of being alex. Was I wrong about this?
if you quote the whole thing you will see that it is a joke.
GIEFF wrote:
Spyrex has 2 posts, and no votes or FOSs.
Cephrir has 3 non-"will catch up later" posts, and none since 4 days ago.
Sensfan has just 1 vote, in his very first post in the thread, which he refuses to explain. This is particularly odd for a player who calls himself "very aggressive", and who is active in other games.
I agree with this. We all have to be active... Spyrex is on V/LA till 20... I'm gonna ask the mod to replace him... 12 straight days without playing (especially on day 1) hurts this game a great deal. There's good players waiting out there.
I'm not liking Sensfan's attitude of not adding practically anything and acting as if he had psychic powers that could solve this game whenever he wanted...
He is supposed to be confrontational but is not using it to scumhunt... He seems to be playing his role...
BM wrote:
It doesnt apply more to Mastin than to Alex. Mastin is the kind of player that will happily shake things up at the start of the game, just for the sake of saying "OMGZ, I KILLED THE RVS". Alex on the other hand, does not have the same meta excuse in my book. The fact he agrees, but hides behind Mastin's coat-tails, seems scummier, dont ya think?
When are you gonna read???!!! dude... I SAID I never played in a game without RVS!! Obviously I don't have any related meta... I thought RVS it was the way to go but seeing the amount of experienced players I liked this turn of events where we got serious from the start.
BM wrote:Gieff wrote:
[*]
Alex is desperate to push the 4 scum theory, yet town should be cautious.
This is incorrect – it is actually MORE cautious to leave the door open to the possibility of 4 scum.
Erm, i didnt even say this. GG reading comprehension. xD
yes you did.
BM ISO 12 wrote:
It's really wierd how you are desperate to push the 4 scum theory, but it is in the interests of the town anyway to promote cautiousness.
BM wrote:
Haha, what?? This is going a little downhill now bro. Given everything that has occurred, what is not scummy about asserting Mastin is protown under so little evidence?
Let's clear something up...
Pro-Town: He acts in a way that helps town. Not lurking, scumhunting, etc. (this can be faked by good scum)
Anti-Town: He acts in a way that is a detriment to town. Lurking. Evading questions. Tunnel vision. etc.
Both of this can be town or scum. The important thing is that if there's a pro-town scum we have a lot of info to search from his posts making it still useful.
If all town players were pro-town. That would force scum players to act accordingly to hide amongst them. Then, it would be very hard for them to win.
I asserted Mastin is pro-town. I didn't assert his allignment is town.
And, also, why do you assert I'm scum under so little reasoning and why do you use that reasoning to chain the assertion that Mastin is town?
BM wrote:The thing is, if you dont think Alex's panicked defence of Mastin was scummy, then i wouldnt expect you to agree with the case on him, because that is pretty much the cornerstone of it.
dude... If, as you say, I'm scum... and Mastin is town... why the fuck woudld I panic? I could only have a motive of panic if I we both were scum or we both were town and I strongly suspected him to be town...
BM wrote:
Also, skimming down your post-what do you feel required response in post 144? As far as i am concerned, suggesting an anti-pairing is hardly anything to get edgy about.
No... Anti pairing can get 2 town players lynched... If you think mastin's NK theory is BS... then Antipairing should be much more BS. It's like when you say... well if player A doesn't die tonight then he is scum... Obv, scum won't kill him knowing you will be foolish enough to lynch him the next day.
Battle Mage wrote:
lmao. Is saying "bro" a well known scumtell these days?
BM
Yes! It totally is!!! You should be dismembered and fed to rottweilers.
SensFan wrote:GIEFF wrote:Sensfan has just 1 vote, in his very first post in the thread, which he refuses to explain. This is particularly odd for a player who calls himself "very aggressive", and who
is active in other games.
That's a massive misrep. I describe myself as extremely aggressive. Not as vote-happy.
But since you seem to care so much, here's a second one:
Vote: GIEFF
Is GIEFF Scum, Sensfan?
Who do you think is scummy?
SensFan wrote:Alex, jammer, GIEFF.
There's a Scum in that group.
I'm much more wary of the following group:
Sensfan, Battle Mage.
Why are you not explaining ANYTHING? I knew I would end up fighting with you... but you can not continue to play like this and expect someone to follow you...
You're not Sherlock Holmes, your allignment is not confirmed town. So you will have to play like everybody else and explain your posts...
Why am I possible scum? Why is jammer possible scum? and why is GIEFF possible scum?
That goes to you to camn... Don't say that BM is scummier or we are both townies or whatever without explaining.
SensFan wrote:
I pity the Town if none of you are Scum. That, and I don't think its possible for all 3 of you to be that scummy, but still Town.
lol... already excusing the fact that you might be mistaken? nice.
why is GIEFF scummier than jammer or me?
Sensfan wrote:
How could I possibly know if there is exactly one? This is the type of stuff that put you on the list.
ohh... so scumhunting puts him on the list.... cool.
BM wrote:
Why should i know that you advertised this game to people? Need i point out that i was not among this elite group?
You need not. But there were hints in the sign up thread that you, apparently, didn't get.
BM wrote:Preventive isnt a word either
I meant preemptive Mrs.Magda.
BM wrote:
Have you never considered that townies might be concerned about being lynched, and hence be paranoid about those who want to lynch them being scum? It's natural.
I know. I don't want to be lynched, ever. But did mastin's theory meant he was scum? Or are you saying that you prefer to remove a threat to you no taking into account his allignment?
BM wrote:
You're contradicting your own assessment of me. First you claim that im insinuating you are scummy, then you admit that i acknowledge there isnt a scum motive for doing so, unless you are just lying at every turn. Super Wifomer? Who's getting tunnel-visioned OMGUS now? lmao
...
dude... I don't even know what to say to you... your sentence doesn't make sense... although you manage to paint me as either an idiot or a liar without explaining anything. Then... you call me tunnel visioned???? me??
I'm not even gonna respond to that...
I'm looking at everyone. I haven't voted you (still). I'm trying to look at all players. I'm trying to read a whole game and not just one quote or one moment. I'm definetly NOT tunnelvisioned and not OMGUSing because I never voted you. I'm just pointing the scummy and fake things about your case.
BM wrote:
There are other alternative game starts, but effectively, random-voting is something of a given. By your own assessment, Mastin did not kill the RVS then?
BM... you're not a lawyer so quit acting like one... lame questions suck. Mastin did kill the RVS IMO. I agreed to the decease of the RVS. There was already a couple of things to talk about.
BM wrote:
Haha, this does feel a little like a conspiracy. But i got that impression from the sign-up thread anyway. At some point, the group who came in together will have to start looking at each other critically.
lol... are you scared? I invited a lot of players here. I know that the odds of all of them being scum must be amazingly low, so I won't even think about it. I'll just play a normal game. I invited people I thought would be active and would make this an enjoyable experience.
BM wrote:
why would i need a response? Are you learning Mafia out of a textbook? lol
I'm writing it. I'll give it to you as a present on your birthday.
BM wrote:
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Ask any other player here if they find your consistent protests about the number of scum wierd, and every single one (probably even your buddies, if they have any sense) will agree with me.
Here is where we draw a line between peculiar and scummy. My actions were not scummy. My actions were Alexhans. I explained my actions. You already made up your mind or are bullshitting so you never tried to logically think about them to realize I was telling the truth and that it was not scummy.
BM wrote:
Funny how you can play this card for yourself, but have no tolerance for my playstyle.
That was my point exactly. You excused your actions as playstyle but not mine...
BM wrote:
Telling the truth? How can you possibly be telling the truth about something you cannot possible know, UNLESS YOU ARE SCUM? *facepalm*
wtf man? you just don't learn do you? You keep trying to go for semantics out of context? Do you even READ what you're saying? It seems to me like you read a sentence and say whatever BS comes to your mind.
BM wrote:
That's funny coming from Mr. Monstro-Post. Also, you really think the Nazi Minister for Propaganda and Enlightenment is a reliable source to quote? haha
BM missed a point ONCE AGAIN!
Yes, I'm comparing you to him!!!! you're using the same tactics.
BM wrote:
You havent responded to the point at all, you're merely trying to play it down. Please feel free to actually explain why you defend Mastin's point about N0 speculation being valuable, whilst acknowledging that you might kill randomly, were you scum.
I can't anymore man... READ BACK...
It's a valid source of investigation. It's not a foolproof theory to lynch someone but it's STILL good and discussion about is very healthy IMO. Didn't you read the first options I gave before random? One was a rep kill (SensFan), the other was Mastin (I admire his scumhunting), then it came a random one... But, as always, you only look a little piece and not at the full picture.
BM wrote:
You seem to have a mild obsession with Cops.
huh?
BM wrote: But, moving past that, the 1 vote, was mine. Therefore, its perfectly legit for me to request a claim, if i feel you ought to be lynched.
I'm not gonna follow up on this because it won't take us anywhere but...
come on...
BM wrote:
Don't be a douche. Did you recruit Mastin for this game?
ohhh!!! I see what you mean now... lol... Yes. I did invite him to the game.
I invited:
qwints, StrangerCoug, VPBaltar, molestargazer, Vi, Shanba, Stephoscope, Kairyuu, Zachrulez, Mastin, WhiteCastle, Firestarter, KublaiKhan, Korlash, orangepenguin, RedCoyote, Battousai, camn and DebonairDannyDiPietro.
I've only played one game with most of this people... And I don't think they will think of me implicitly as town... The "support" that you claim they gave me was because you pretended I didn't know the setup when I advertised it to them stating clearly that it was a mountanious game... NO PR's involved. I even called it the real deal mafia or something
-------------------
Battle Mage wrote:SensFan wrote:jammer wrote:SensFan wrote:Alex, jammer, GIEFF.
There's a Scum in that group.
Could you explain the reasoning behind it?
I pity the Town if none of you are Scum. That, and I don't think its possible for all 3 of you to be that scummy, but still Town.
jammer wrote:And with a scum you mean only one, or atleast one.
How could I possibly know if there is exactly one? This is the type of stuff that put you on the list.
I lol'd.
Unvote, Vote: Gieff
Might as well put my vote somewhere useful.
BM
... , ... and more ...
wTf, WTF and wtF?
May I ask why did you vote GIEFF? How is it useful? do you think he is scum? Why? Are you certain he is scum?
--------------------------
Benmage wrote:
Oh ya duh..confusing games I’m in. So than the point of Alex Knowing Mastin as town could be because he’s scum.
dude... are you that lost? So BM asking for a claim didn't bother you at all? weird. Rolefishing is not scummy?
Benmage wrote:
Post 174…That was painfully filled with fluff. Disclaimer of fluff at top next time please.
No... I was responding to BM's bullshit.
Benmage wrote:
Most of his argument seemed like bantering nitpicky fluff. There were a few decent points.
I think he was suggesting one point of view wherein Alex could be scum.
If that was the case in this specific point of view Mastin would almost certaintly be town. He continues to express that in this perspective if Alex flips town, all assumptions of Mastin would be dropped and we’d return to our previous positions on Mastin before analyzing this Alex point of view. (Which were scummy opinions of Mastin)
BM acted "certain" that I was scum in all of his posts...
------------------------
- Vi and RedCoyote were willing to play.
Mod: Did you let Vi know that we need him to replace in?
are you considering replacing SpyreX? Will the deadline give us enough time for him to catch up and give us enough input?
I'm back...