Big Brother Mafia - Town wins!
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Not posting a reason isn't the same as not having one.SlySly wrote:4 completely reasonless votes so far, 5 if you include Mufasa's vote. Someone is up to no good and, in my opinion, the early indicators are not pointing at Mufasa.
If I were HoH, I'd nominate Saber and PaltryKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Pretty sure he never said that. In fact, I'm pretty sure he said we should scumhunt like any other game.Snow_Bunny wrote:
Hmm... So, instead of scumhunting we should go with townhunting? Sounds interesting. Right now, I'm getting the most town vibes from you, so...SlySly wrote:
Same as in any mafia game, good old fashioned scum hunting. I don't know about you, but I would prefer a floater get the first HoH as opposed to a member of one of the scum teams. I would be hopeful that our scum hunting gives the HoH some good info as to who they should nominate for eviction and give the rest of us good info as to where we should place our votes on their nominated evictees.saberwolf wrote: Have you another idea on how to choose?
Nominate: SlySly
Because along with Snowbunny, you are my top suspects right now. I want to try to nominate scum if I'm HOH.PaltryExcuse wrote:
Why nominate these people in particular?Kmd4390 wrote:If I were HoH, I'd nominate Saber and Paltry
Yep. Who the HOH chooses to (or not to) nominate can give us some info on them. A lot of people seem to have trouble reading Zwet, so why not give him first stab at HOH?SlySly wrote: Does that mean there is a reason behind your vote for zwet?
--------------
Sens, I don't know the list system you are talking about.
-------------
HoH applicationform
1) Do you think it matters a good/experienced player gets elected as HoH?
Answer: Not really. Meh, maybe it's better for an experienced player to get it because that's who probably has the best chance of hitting scum. But if a poor player makes decisions that make them obvscum, that's just as good for town.
2) Do you think HoH should be guided by town? (as in, we still vote, and HoH picks the highest 2 in the VC)
Answer: It's the HOH's choice. If they want to be guided, fine. I personally wouldn't let everyone else tell me who to nominate. I'd listen to suggestions, but that doesn't mean I'd follow them.
3) If you are very suspicious of someone, would you pick him together with a seemingly town person if you were HoH to be sure your suspect gets lynched?
Answer:If I'm suspicious enough of a player, sure. But I'd make sure the pawn is someone who no one seems to suspect.
4) If i were HoH, i would pick ___ and ___
Answer: Saber and Paltry right now. Snow could make my list too.
This is a scummy post. "Hey, let's not scumhunt. Let's not talk about who is scum. Let's all direct each other with no reasoning at all".saberwolf wrote:I just don't want to see this turn into Sen's tree stump game, All talk and no direction.
I'll scumhunt if needed, but I much rather get the ball rolling now, it just makes it easier is all.
You won't find anything. If you don't look at least.animorpherv1 wrote: What am I really going to findout 1 page into Day 1? I think your over questioining, imo.
Why?saberwolf wrote:I don't want HoH
---------------
Saber is right. Grandi and Dis aren't scum together.
Note: I don't care that this appeared in other games.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Paltry,
-you started the game with non-game conversation.
-You nom'd Sly simply for asking questions.
-I didn't like your question to Saber about "semi-random".
-Your HOH application seems to overly stress that we need a town HOH. It seems obvious enough and shouldn't have to be forced in there like that. The question had nothing to do with alignment. Only experience and skill.
-I don't like that you can't give two suspects yet, but are confident enough that Sly is town that you are willing to nominate him. If this were a normal game, I'd like to know who you'd be voting right now.
-You seem too quick to discount Grandi and DisCode having to be on opposing factions (or both town). But the logic is there.
Though you do have these town points:
-I like most of your HOH application. I tend to agree with a lot of what you said.
-You are right to question Grandi about posting his own applicationKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
How's this different from any other game's lynch? Playing conservatively won't get us anywhere.Sironigous wrote: Blah. TRUE! It's just the outcome that could do not so good stuff. eh...
Meh. Lynching/Evicting... Same thing.SlySly wrote: I can appreciate what you are saying here, but there is no lynching in this game. If something you did as HoH is unacceptable, you will have to be put on the block by a later HoH and evicted by everyone else. That creates somewhat of a safety cushion in this game for rogue players, which, imo, makes it easier for scum to go against town wishes as HoH. It is not as simple as, you screwed up and we are going to lynch you for it. If you aren't put on the block for your scummy actions, you won't be lynched for them like in a regular game of mafia.
There's no "saftey cushion". Someone will be evicted every day just like someone is lynched every day in any other game. If someone is scummy, they are more likely to be evicted. The only difference is the mechanics. We will still be evicting the same players who we'd normally lynch for the most part.
----------
Paltry,
"friendly conversation" isn't null. It's a distraction from the game and is anti-town at best.
You didn't seem to be "questioning" Saber. More just commenting. You didn't really do much with it.
Yeah, that's the thing. You don't feel ready to call anyone scum, but at the same time you are ready to call Sly town and hand him HOH. Yet you can't even name the two scummiest players in the game in your opinion. I'd be satisfied just to hear one name from you because the only stance you've taken is "SlySly for HOH!".
If Mufasa and Whoot were scum together, I don't think they'd have been replaced in their situation. Nobody even knew about the situation until after the fact, so it wasn't an issue if they were scumbuddies.
--------------
Saber (Post 123), stop being retarded and play.
-------------
DisCode, yes, I want scum gone. But at the same time, I'd like to take a look at our HOH. See who they nominate. Who they connect themselves to or don't. I also think that, if town, Zwet can catch a scum. I'm confident in his ability as far as scumhunting.
It doesn't matter when they were posted. Discussion about the theme generally will drag out, so it's anti-town even if it's during confirmations.
My issue is more the fact that he can be so confident in a player being town, yet is uncomfortable naming even one scum. I didn't point it out earlier because I didn't see it. He asked why he was scummy, so I looked.
The "semi random" thing could have been a lot more than he let it be. He kind of dropped a comment and left it at that instead of actively questioning. It didn't seem to be enough of an issue after he pointed it out.
Why Paltry for HOH?
-------------
So Finch takes a stance, gets called on it, and backs off. Noted.
-------------
Sly, is Sens individually scummy or just connected to Saber? Could the fact that they know each other IRL have anything to do with the connection you are seeing?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Because I think you're dumb, not necessarily scum.saberwolf wrote:
Screw you, why not me?Kmd4390 wrote:Haven't caught up yet, but Paltry and Finch are the best choices from what I've seen.
Paltry and Finch. Let me catch up before committing to that though.SlySly wrote: I want everyone to give me the two people they would like me to put up.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Paltry Post 145-
Ok, you've been "focused" as in posting. But up to the point of the post I am responding to, you haven't really done any scumhunting.
About Saber, you pretty much dropped one comment and left it at that. You didn't continue with it at all. And that amounts to ALL of your scumhunting up to that point.
Ok, if Mufasa and Whoot were banned site-wide, that changes things. I didn't know that.
-------------
Sly's 146-
The eviction is the equivelent of a lynch. It's just done by different mechanics. More times than not, the player being evicted will be one of the players who is most widely seen as scummy.
--------------
Sly's 148-
In this game, Zwet hasn't show his ability to find scum. Neither has anyone else. Nobody has flipped yet.
--------------
Paltry 172-
I actually agree.
--------------
Paltry 174-
Why use the word "admittedly" there?Paltry wrote:I'd nominate Saber: He has been admittedly scummy
-------------
Sly 193-
I wasn't unwilling to point out my reasons for choosing Zwet. I pointed them out pretty clearly.
-----------
Sly 200-
At the time that I posted that, I thought it was pretty clear that Saber and Paltry were my top choices, but I was also watching Snow.
------------
Llama 205-
I'd have picked Sly over Sens. Why Sens has votes for HOH is beyond me, so Sly was obviously a better choice.
-----------
Finch's 208, while not a great post, shows a town thought process. Hmm.
(The arguement on Llama is a bad one, but one I think town would make)
----------
Sly 215-
Why do you think I've stated a "core choice"?
----------
Sir 218-
Don't assume. I'd prefer a Paltry eviction to a Saber one.
---------
Hmm. Sly's 240 has an interesting way of avoiding the points Sens makes.
---------
Sly 296-
Good because I don't think Finch is one of the best choices anymore. Here's a preference list. Best choices at top, worst at bottom:
PaltryExcuse- Reasons given plenty. Just read my post history.
saberwolf - Reasons given plenty. Just read my post history.
animorpherv1- Can't shake a gut feeling. Seems to have been ignored so far.
Grandi- Lurker. Needs to contribute. Also gave the HOH application without submitting his own.
DisCode -Lurker. Needs to contribute.
zwetschenwasser - Pretty null read. Hasn't really done a thing.
snow_bunny -Didn't like some early posts. Recent posts seem more natural.
Mr Finch - Didn't like some early posts. The post in response to Llama seemed town.
Crazy -Seems pretty town. One case where I'm actually not listening to my gut, which says scum.
Sironigous -Seems pretty town.
SensFan -Seems very town. I disagree with his HOH method, but don't think he's scum for it.
Llamafluff- Seems very town. I agree with most of what he's done so far.
Kmd4390 -Don't nom me.
Obviously, the top two on my list, Paltry and Saber, would be my ideal noms.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
If they were banned, they are unable to play regardless of anything related to this game. That makes them being replaced a complete null tell.SlySly wrote:
In what way?Kmd4390 wrote: Ok, if Mufasa and Whoot were banned site-wide, that changes things. I didn't know that.
I don't support anything he's done in this game, because, well, he hasn't done anything. I wanted to see him as HOH to make him do something and get a read on who he connects himself to and whatever other information we could take from his nominations.SlySly wrote: Your support of zwet is very suspicious. He has donenothingin this game but you seem very willing to stick your neck out for him.
We were going to get absolutely no information at all from Sens' nominations because he was going to have the town do everything for him. Zwet would have been, by far, a better choice than Sens for HOH.SlySly wrote: At least Sens offered up PJ's list method. Why zwet had a vote for HoH is far beyond me, he offered nothing.
I agreed with that from the very beginning. That's why I wanted to put him in a position where he has to take a stance.SlySly wrote: Glad to see you agree on him doing nothing, now, again please, why were you supporting him so strongly as HoH?
If scum ONLY said things I disagree with all the time, this game would be a lot easier.PaltryExcuse wrote:On Kmd's case
Twice you've agreed with what I've said (my HoH application and Post 172 where I question why SensFan has support) and yet you find me scummy.
Right. That's exactly what I'm saying.Paltry wrote:I'll admit that my scumhunting hasn't been as aggressive as others, but I don't think it is as negligible as you're making it out to be.
1) I did question Saber, however, I I could've pursued him on it further.
Fair enough.Paltry wrote:2) I did question the disappeared Grandi why he didn't answer his own HoH application questions.
No way! You questioned someone for doing something with no reasons! You MUST be town now!Paltry wrote:3) When Finch gives no reason for nomming SensFan, I question him on it, prompting him to switch his nomination.
And?Paltry wrote:4) One of two posts you agree with, is me commenting on why people were pushing for a SensFan HoH.
No, I gave a reason. I just waited until asked to bring more attention to the idea of a Zwet-HOH, but that didn't work. And I had no problem with your Sly-nom. It was just the fact that you couldn't name any suspects at the time you were so strongly supporting Sly. Seems like you are being careful not to step on any toes.Paltry wrote:What is weird is that you nominated Zwet without giving ANY reasons, and you question my nom of Sly because I gave a reason early on. It got stronger as I saw him scum hunt, hence why it didn't change late in the day.
Seems like you are being forced to admit something that you'd rather not admit to.Paltry wrote:
Why not?Kmd4390 wrote:
Why use the word "admittedly" there?PaltryExcuse wrote: I'd nominate Saber: He has been admittedly scummy
This is a terrible way to think.animorpherv1 wrote:@kmd:
Yup. Being ignored in this game (to a point) seems like a good idea. It keeps you off the radar and less likley to be up for elimination.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ok, that makes more sense.SensFan wrote: You're misreading the word 'admittedly'.
Try looking at it as if it read: "I'd nominate Saber: He has been scummy by his own admission". It makes a whole lot more sense. Especially given's saber's recent decision to ruin games (leading to him being banned from joining games, might I add).
-----------------
Paltry 345,
I agree with you about Animorph. He's pretty high on my list.
I agree about Grandi. He's been replaced though.
I agree about Zwet. To answer your question, if he was HOH he would have no choice but to nominate two people. The two people the HOH chooses can tell us a lot about an HOH. The fact that Zwet offers nothing but short baseless posts is even more reason for us to get information on him any way we can.
Sir is mostly a gut town feeling.
Finch's post showed a town thought process that is hard to fake. Then again, I used this logic once recently in another game and it turned out to be my traitor scumbuddy.
Snow seems to be playing how she normally does. She's one of the players I have the hardest time reading though.
If you were nominated for HOH, you'd HAVE TO put up two players for eviction. Sly is asking for two names from you now and you haven't given any. Change that ASAP.zwetschenwasser wrote:Why does KMD think I would take a position if I were nominated? Wouldn't that do absolutely nothing?
--------------
Sly, I'm not even sure what to say about your suspicion on me. I've explained why I wanted Zwet as HOH. The rest of your case seems to be that I played well as scum in Mirth's game.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
So there's really no way to defend against Sly's case.
-Point A) Wanted Zwet HOH
-Defense A) Informational HOH choice
-Counter A) Acknowledges defense, but says it makes no sense.
-Point B) Meta
-Defense B) Really can't defend.
-Point C) Llama wanted me as HOH
-Defense C) Really can't defend.
There's not much I can say about this...KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Yes.Sly wrote:Considering his play in this game so far, do you really still think it would be in the town's best interest to have zwet deciding who is going to be on the block?
1. This helps town by making Zwet obvscum and evicted at first opportunity.Sly wrote:Let's hypothesize for a second:
1. zwet-scum is HoH and puts up 2 townies for eviction that everyone disagrees with.
2. A townie gets lynched and unknowingly gives HoH to a seemingly town player that is actually zwet-scum's scumbuddy.
2. How is this different from the evictee picking a scum HOH in any other scenario?
Easy. The next HOH after Zwet's buddy nominates Zwet and his now obvscum buddy. Town has identified two scum in your hypothetical scenario. Doesn't sound so disasterous to me. Best part is, you just showed how a Zwet-HOH can net us two scum if Zwet is scum.Sly wrote:How would zwet-scum be made to pay for his obvscum actions in this scenario?
I try to make my scum game as close to my town game as possible. I guess I did a good job of that in Mirth's.Sly wrote:In my opinion, you are playing very similarly to the way you played in Mirth's game. You said it best when you said...
Fair enough, but unless Llama flips scum first, how is that a point against me?Sly wrote:It isn't that Llama wanted you as HoH, it's that his reasoning for wanting you in over me was bogus.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I'm not supporting Zwet at all. I would have picked him as the first HOH, but after that, I have done nothing in his favor. Hell, I haven't even called him town and you make it out like I have this massive town read on him. I don't.
About your scenario, If two players who are either town or in a specific scum group have to die to take out two scumbuddies, I don't mind the sacrafice.
You seem to think we will never have a town HOH.Sly wrote:Yeah, once again assuming that zwet 2nd scum buddy didn't end up in power right after that somehow. I am finding it very hard to believe the persistence you are demonstrating to keep the rose colored glasses on in this game!
Again, unless Llama is scum, how is this a point against me?Sly wrote:Llama's persistence to defend you over me and to perpetually attempt to make difference in our stated stances, when our stated opinions were basically the same, show connection to you the same way your perpetual defense of zwet, to me, illustrates your connection to him.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
^This is the problem with Sly's suspicions. Too many of them rely too much on other suspicions being accurate.saberwolf wrote:Sly: what happens to your views on sens and kmd if zwet was voted off first and flipped town?
what happens if only one of the three flips scum, and the other town, how does that affect the third's alignment in your mind?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
The first part about everything being perfect, no. The part about making scummy players pay, yes. It's not always easy, but it can be done. The only way seemingly protown players are evicted is if the HOH nominates them which puts a target on the HOH's back. Just sayin'.Sly wrote: You seem to think that everything is going to work out perfect for the town every step of the way and that making scum acting players pay for their actions is going to be as easy as it is in any old regular game of mafia. I don't see it that way.
Thanks for proving my point I guess?Sly wrote:If Llama is scum, the connection I sense is a point against you. Obviously if Llama flips town, that wouldn't be a point against you and I would have to reevaluate my position.
No, my position of pushing scummy players as scummy doesn't rely on anything. It's just how mafia works.Sly wrote:The problem with your position is that it relies too much on everything working out perfectly every step of the way. I can only see scum trying to convince the town that it will work out so well.
^This. I've seen Sens do this as town (Yaw's large normal) and scum (my Twilight game). Honestly, this is more similar to what he did as scum, but in Yaw's game, he did do something like this as town.Snow_Bunny wrote:I actually don't find Sens' request for replacement scummy. More like a childish attitude, but that's all. Why, I have found myself in that exact position in the past (though I never requested a replacement), and I can sort of understand that.
SlySly wrote:
Oh crap. Time snuck up on me...farside22 wrote:Reminder to the HOH. Looking for a replacement for Sensfarside22 wrote:
Please post in bold your nomination by Dec 7th 4:40pm PST
Once you place 2 nominee's in bold you can not change your mind.Thank you.
1.nominate: kmd
2.nominate: Sens
zwet and saber are easy enough targets for the next HoH. kmd is the person I feel is the craftiest scum, so I want to put him up against someone that I feel gives him the best shot at being evicted.
This is my issue with Sly. The points against me rely on other people being scum. If Zwet, Llama, and Paltry are town, the only point Sly has is that I play well as scum which is a BS point and makes me more of a policy lynch than anything.PaltryExcuse wrote:Please explain one thing to me:
kmd is scum because of his relationship to zwet. Therefore zwet and kmd are scum.
Llama and kmd have a connection, making Llama scum.
kmd attacks me, I show an interest in using the veto on him: I am scum.
That's 4 scum on one team.
--------------------------
Who does everyone want as the next HOH? I'm not going to just take who everyone says, but I want input. I'm leaning Snow-Bunny.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Because I have no idea who you'd nominate, so it would force you to either pick two players or let the town guide you. Either way, it helps town get a read on you.Snow_Bunny wrote:Why me, Kmd?
Bit busy now, will post something useful later, when I have time.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Elaborate on B please. I'd like to see the case because I don't really have a read on Zwet at all.animorpherv1 wrote:
A) You don't show upzwetschenwasser wrote:I'm surprised and angered I wasn't chosen.
B) Your scummy
C) You only post 1 sentenceKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ok, you keep calling Llama scummy and use that as a reason why I'm scummy. Yet you said earlier that the only point against Llama is his support for me as HOH. What is your current stance on Llama and why?SlySly wrote:
I'm convinced that either of my choices will flip scum, though I would prefer the kmd eviction. Since you think Sens will be voted out over kmd in a policy fashion, I think it is highly scummy for you to be pushing to use up one of the 2 POV's available to the town in this game, also in a policy fashion.LlamaFluff wrote:What the hell is up with a kmd nom?
That will seriously give zero information to town since almost everyone will policy anti-vote kmd.
I fully support a PoV use just to obtain information from day one. (with a zwet/ani replacement)KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
If Llama and Paltry both flip town, am I still scum?SlySly wrote: Well, Llama did just add another point of scuminess to my list by lobbying to waste the POV on you when it is pretty clear you aren't going to be voted out. With that said, it appears Paltry added a point of scuminess to my list by actually wasting the POV on you when it is pretty clear you weren't going to be voted out. My stance now is that one of those 2 is your scumbuddy, if not both.
I'm ignoring 1 and 2 for obvious reasons.SlySly wrote: 1. connection to zwet / wanting zwet as HoH
2. connection to Llama
3. I felt his targeting of you was baseless and it appeared to be scum trying to cast suspicion on a pro-town player. Now it seems possible that it was distancing the entire time.
4. craftily trying to fly under the radar as I have seen him do before. He and anyone else can call this bs, but I have seen it firsthand before and his play in this game is reminding me heavily of what I have seen before.
3. So you disagree with my early suspicion and that makes me scum?
4. No. I HATE to be under the radar. I like to be in control regardless of alignment.
Why do I have to be nominated for you to ask questions?pablito wrote: I for one, was looking forward to at least getting to ask questions of kmd to get a little better view on him.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
But you are basing this on connections to other players. If those players are town, your suspicion against me is baseless. The only point you have on me that doesn't rely on another player's flip is that I am a good scum player. Nominating me on that alone is a policy nomination. Would you propose a policy lynch on me in a normal game?SlySly wrote:
If you are scum, no matter who flips what, you are still scum.Kmd4390 wrote: If Llama and Paltry both flip town, am I still scum?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
You aren't getting it. Your "combination of things" is this:SlySly wrote:
My nominating you was based on a combination of things. In a regular game of mafia, I am not 100% opposed to policy lynches, so if the situation was right for a policy lynch, yes I would.Kmd4390 wrote: But you are basing this on connections to other players. If those players are town, your suspicion against me is baseless. The only point you have on me that doesn't rely on another player's flip is that I am a good scum player. Nominating me on that alone is a policy nomination. Would you propose a policy lynch on me in a normal game?
-connections to players who you view as scummy (wouldn't it be better to get their flip before nominating me on a connection to them?)
-meta based policy (I don't see how this even fits)KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Wow, you're a dick. Ruining games for an avatar bet. I don't want my creation of avatar beta turning into something like that...saberwolf wrote:I had to sign up for every single game in the sign up thread that was currently open, and not flake from any of them. If I manged to not flake, and finish every game, I win and I get to change his avatar for 2 months. If I lose, he changes mine for two months. Luckily, Ani left lots of loopholes, so I've campaigned for my lynch in every game I'm in that I signed up for.
Hope that doesn't change things with us hewitt
*Shrug*hewitt wrote: Back on topic saberwolf you're not playing with SensFan anymore so don't ever refer to my spot as SensFan again. I know that's a little hypocritical since I just compared another player to him in a game we're both in but I'd prefer if everything to do with him was past tense.
When you replace a player, you take responsibility for any tells that player gave off. I'm still leaning slightly town on you and some of that comes from Sens. That's just the proper way to look at the game.
Hypothetically, who would you nominate right now if you had to choose two players?Snow_Bunny wrote:
Oh, I see. Don't worry, if I must put my effort on it, I will.Kmd4390 wrote:
Because I have no idea who you'd nominate, so it would force you to either pick two players or let the town guide you. Either way, it helps town get a read on you.Snow_Bunny wrote:Why me, Kmd?
Bit busy now, will post something useful later, when I have time.
If Hewitt is town and your replacement nominee is scum and is evicted, the veto wasn't wasted.SlySly wrote:Still awaiting answer from kmd on this...
SlySly wrote: Llama is on the hotseat. What do you think of the POV being wasted on you when you had no votes on you? Think that decision was a little on the rushed side? If yes, what does that say to you?
I would have gotten more of a reaction from everyone before actually using it, but I don't have a problem with the fact that he used it. The no votes thing is BS. Paltry, if I'm remembering correctly, didn't want to vote Sens. So it makes sense to want a new player on the block.
SlySly wrote:nominate:DisCode
Choose carefully, your votes can't be undone.Vote DisCode
I really like this choice.
what was good about his posts?LlamaFluff wrote: He was NOT LURKING. Look at his history. A few good posts, a gap untill a 'will catchup' post, then nothing. So thats not lurking, thats flaking, which is a null tell.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Sly, so we agree that the veto being used quickly was probably wrong, correct? Because I thought your issue was the fact that it was used. If it was the speed of it, I can see that. Although that seems more like a playstyle thing than a scumtell.
Snow, thanks for the answer.
Hewitt, I find the use of the word "pawn" weird next to the names you list.
Sly, how the hell have you "saved Hewitt's neck"? You nominated him (well..Sens) for eviction.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
What are you talking about? No one with more than 1 vote on this list was even nominated. I see Zwet and Animorph with 2 votes and I see Hewitt and DisCode on the block. (And technically 2 is plurality, not majority)SlySly wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:
What majority suggestion?Sly wrote:Non-participation has someone on the block right now based on the reasoning of majority suggestion
No other suggestion vote reason had more than 1 vote.SlySly wrote:
3 votes by reason of not helpful or non-participation, 4 if you cound pablito's "bunch of nothing" reasoning.slysly wrote:Replacement suggestions and reasoning so far:
Llama(1)- SlySly (tunneling, lobby for waste of POV, ignoring questions)
zwet(2)- Mr. finch (non-participation, useless), animo (non-participation, useless)
saber(1)- hewitt (policy lynch, suspects won't be helpful)
snow_bunny(1)- saber (no reason given)
animo(2)- Llama (crap he pulled), Crazy (ani voted Sens due to Sens replacement request)
siroginous(1)- pablito (saying a bunch of nothing, push for specific plan earlier)
No it isn't. It's a mafia game first. It just happens to be a Big Brother theme.SlySly wrote: If you don't like flavor, don't sign up for theme games. This is Big Brother Mafia. It is a combination of both games, period. You can't separate them.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
It's a mafia game with a Big Brother theme. It is NOT a Big Brother game. The idea is to find the scum like in mafia (if you are town), NOT to be the last remaining player like in Big Brother. If you are playing this like Big Brother, you are NOT playing to your win condition.SlySly wrote: Yes, it is. It is a combined game, not one first and then the other. The name of the game is Big Brother Mafia. Point me to another game of mafia that has POV and coup d'eta. This is not called Mafia with touches of Big Brother.
Actually, Zwet/Llama/Paltry's actions combined with me being a good scum player make me scum. DisCode is the 5th scum on our team. Haven't you been reading Sly's posts?Crazy wrote: Going off of an associative tell for the first vote is very weird. Especially since your main reason for thinking Llama is scum was his relation to Kmd and Sens (in regard to his explanation for his vote for Kmd as HoH, which you didn't like)! I think you're spiraling a bit out of control here with your whole "DisCode is tied to LlamaFluff, and LlamaFluff is tied to Kmd, and since Kmd is scum, that means LlamaFluff is scum, so DisCode is also scum." And all this without Kmd even flipping scum yet!
1. How the hell is there any WIFOM here?SlySly wrote: He wasn't replaced when I nominated him. WIFOM.
2. So what if there was?
I'll try when I have time.LlamaFluff wrote: @kmd - Can you put up a DC case?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Realizing that Sens and Hewitt got the same Role PM, what is your read on Hewitt now and why?animorpherv1 wrote: Out of kmd/Sens :Sens. Kmd wasb't acting scumym and replacing out because of bad players is a bad move, and I sonsider it scummy.
Out of bv310/hewitt: bv310. Hewitt looked way more townie, and seemed more helpfuk overall.
hewitt wrote:Okay so pre-eviction I stated that my nominees would be SlySly and saberwolf. Obviously I would like to get every single player's nominations before I make my own.
Hmm. Absolutely no info to take from this. Animorph and Snow_Bunny work as noms.farside22 wrote:- Kmd4390, animorpherv1, Paltry Excuse, MrFinch, SnowBunny, Crazy, Sirongous, Kast, Pablitobv310
Hewitt - saberwolf
How is it a scumtell that I agreed with you? And your "previously stated reasons" are crap.SlySly wrote: If it were up to me, I would put up kmd ("really liked" the DisCode nomination, among other previously stated reasons, which I can restate upon request)KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Elaborate instead of just throwing names out. (Hypocritical of me, I know, but I'd like to know if you have reasons for suspecting those players)pablito wrote:Right now Sly and Paltry are top suspects, but Sironigous shouldn't be getting a free pass either.
I'm also feeling a bit of a lack of punch coming from Crazy. Kinda coasting.
Yeah, I'll be first to admit I was happy to see your choice. But if you'd leave my quote of you instead of cutting it out like you did, you clearly used it as a reason to suspect me. My question was why.SlySly wrote:
I am just reminding everyone that you "really liked" that pick that everyone else hated and were very quick to vote DisCode out with authority.Kmd4390 wrote: How is it a scumtell that I agreed with you?
Look. Meta is great, don't get me wrong. But the major flaw is that the meta "tell" you have on me (being a "good" scum player) labels me as scum in any game I play with you.SlySly wrote: Time will tell. Seems like we have been here before. Seen any Bigfoot tracks?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ok, but why do you see it as a point against me that I agreed with you? Why is this question so hard to answer?
Your points against me were the "meta" and connections. If you are downplaying the DisCode agreement and the meta, your main point against me is actions of other players who have yet to flip scum.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
So suspecting DisCode is a scumtell against me and a nulltell against you? Why?
As for my reasons,
A)Didn't like most of what he said
B)Heavily lurkied (which later meant flaking, so I was wrong there, but meh)
C)Saw two players appear to connect themselves to him (See? I wait for the flip before sharing connections I see)KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Snow, if Sly were to have the veto, who would you want evicted? If you were HoH, who would you evict? What about if you were HoH and Sly claimed to have the veto?
-------------
Sly, you are making no sense about DisCode.
There's no point discussing connections I saw to a player who has flipped town. Those connections have already been proven wrong.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Not really. This seems to be your thought process:SlySly wrote: My thoughts about you and the DisCode pick make perfect sense.
-You nominated DisCode
-I liked the choice and voted him over Hewitt
-People called you scummy for your nomination
-I should ALSO be considered scummy for agreeing with it.
If I were to be considered scummy for agreeing with your choice, shouldn't your choice be considered scummy first? For the point to be accurate against me, wouldn't it have to be accurate against you first? For me to be scum based on this point, wouldn't you have to be scum first?
It's not withholding information (which I don't consider a scumtell) if there is no information to be withholding. I didn't see the other two players as being all that scummy on their own, so I wouldn't have wanted them nominated before DisCode anyway. So there was no point going into it.SlySly wrote:
You should have shared those thought when I was HoH and asking for nomination reasoning. Withholding information is a scum tell.Kmd4390 wrote: There's no point discussing connections I saw to a player who has flipped town. Those connections have already been proven wrong.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Hmm. Do I vote the player I think could be scum or one of my most obvtown reads in the entire game? Tough choice. You're right, I should have hesitated to make that decision. (Note the sarcasm)SlySly wrote: Yep, see it makes perfect sense. You did fail to point out how you made your vote without hesitation or reason though, which adds to the scumminess of your support for a nomination that ultimately flipped town.
I just think it's weird that rather than defend the point, you are basically saying that I should be seen as scummy for the same reasons.SlySly wrote: If my nomination of DisCode is to be considered scummy, the scumminess of anyone supporting that nomination should be looked into as well. Someone being scummy in another's eyes does not make them scum.
.........animorpherv1 wrote: FFFFFF. Sens I thought would help (at the beginning) but turned out to be a big pain, which screwed over the town. That made me consider him as scum. Hewitt did none of that.
Sens and Hewitt share a role PM. If Sens was scum, Hewitt is scum.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Meh. Had an obvtown read on Sens while he was here. His ragequit was a slight scumtell based on meta. Hewitt's play has been more obvtown. Overall, I'm saying obvtown.SlySly wrote: One of your most obvtown reads? You are teetering now. How come in the same post where you voted DisCode without reason or hesitation did you state that you were only "leaning slightly town" on hewitt?
So you are saying that I am scummy for the SAME reasons that you are scummy. You can NOT make this point without calling yourself scummy first.Sly wrote:It is really pretty simple, if you are going to consider someone scummy for a stance, you should consider anyone else that takes or agrees with that same stance scummy too.
-----------------
Hewitt, I like your nom list. I'd choose Animorph and Snow from that list.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I'm not twisting a thing. If I am scummy for suspecting DisCode, you are scummy for it. And you are using it as a point against me. To make this point, you have to admit to your own scuminess.SlySly wrote:
Others have called me scummy for it already. If they feel I am scummy for it, I feel obligated to point out your support of the same thing they are calling me scummy for. Twist it all you want. It doesn't change anything.Kmd4390 wrote: So you are saying that I am scummy for the SAME reasons that you are scummy. You can NOT make this point without calling yourself scummy first.
I'm done arguing with a brick wall though. I'm sure everyone else sees the point I am making and there is no point trying to convince you because you are stuck on the idea that I am scum and I can't change your mind.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Who would you choose as a second nom?animorpherv1 wrote:vote:SlySlyChoosing nominations noone likes isn't a town tell.
No. What made you think that?Crazy wrote: I thought Snowbunny was one of your higher town reads.
Um. Are you implying that I shouldn't have voted to evict someone who I liked to see nominated for eviction?Crazy wrote: Now that Sly has brought it up... why did you say you liked the bv nomination and then still vote to evict him?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
SlySly wrote:What he said can be interpreted in 2 ways. Interpret in my way and it is very close to Ad Hom. You seem very hard set on keeping any battle of semantics open with me in this game. Do you think you are going to get me to concede this point anymore than you have other points in this game? If so, I guess we can go a few rounds and say the same things over and over until you see I am not going to change my opinion once again.LlamaFluff wrote: Also thanks to someones stupid noms we only have one PoV left... so
The difference is his actual quote calls the noms stupid where you seem to think he is calling you specifically stupid.Sly's interpretation of Llama's quote wrote:Also thanks to someonesstupidsnoms we only have one PoV left... soKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Your logic for suspecting Llama is almost as bad as your logic for suspecting me. I'm trying to help you see this, but I'm getting nowhere.SlySly wrote: Same question to you kmd. How is this discussion helping the nomination process in anyway?
Ok, I can see how you'd think that. Actually, to start the game, Snow was one of my bigger scum reads. She started to look more town, but managed to slip back up my scumlist.Crazy wrote:
This:Kmd wrote:No. What made you think that?Kmd wrote:Who does everyone want as the next HOH? I'm not going to just take who everyone says, but I want input. I'm leaning Snow-Bunny.
I want to see who she does/doesn't nom if she's HoH. It was the same thing with Zwet. It helps us read those who don't make it easy. As I stated earlier, I have a hard time reading Snow. Forcing her to make two noms would help me make connections if there are connections to make.
We have to remember that there are two scumgroups. Even if Snow is scum, maybe we evict scum from the other group if she's HoH. And if we can get a better read on her at the same time, we're in good shape. That's kind of why I want to see who she suspects and have been trying to get her to actually scumhunt. Even scum should be scumhunting (for the other group), so there's no excuse not to scumhunt.
Wait, what's the theory and why am I disputing it?SlySly wrote:You should have posted your claim immediately after I made this post. If you say you didn't see it, not reading the thread = scumtell. kmd never disputed this theory either.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Paltry, an the ISO scan, I went to your posts and hit ctrl+f and typed in "Sly". Everything I read in the beginning looked like a boner-hard town read on him. At the point in the game where people start to turn on Sly, your mentioning of Sly is all questioning and criticizing him. Maybe you don't directly call him scummy (until your wishy washy answer just now), but it's clear you've dropped your hard town read. My question to you still stands. Why?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Right, you're going to want reasoning on that.
Snow doesn't give opinions until pressured. When pressured, she pretty much restates what everyone else says and tries to pass it as her own. When called on something, she refrains from posting or just ignores it completely. She's too worried about looking good and not worried enough about finding scum.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I find it interesting that your entire view of his posting has changed from positive to negative though. If I were to put + and - signs by your implied opinion of him each time you mention him, the beginning of the game would be nothing but + while everything after a certain point becomes -. It doesn't look like something that one action naturally causes. Not much changed in Sly's posting, so it's all the way you percieve him or want us to think you percieve him. I find it very interesting.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008