Gand are you serious?
Pedit, I forgot, troll, from whom I stole my random vote policy from is in this game.
There be scum on this wagon!Votecount wrote:4 ~ Mariyta (Vi, inHimshallibe, Zorblag, gandalf5166)
False...Exe wrote:Sorry, I've been falling behind with this game lately. Let's see here.
Tans ties between me, VPB, and Gandalf are a huge reach. I don't know if I believe he's really genuine in it. Like that I'm linked to Gandalf just because I think he's been pro-town: Because, you know, scum would definitely overtly state that their scum-buddies are pro-town. That seems likely.
Mariyta, stop trying to parrot VPB's "pre-flip connections" argument.Mothrax jumped in to attack Gandalf in order to derail the wagon on you.I sense an ulterior motive: do you really think he just happened to find Gandalf scummy AND find you townie, and gandalf just happened to be on your wagon? Considering that his Gandalf case was crap anyways, I sense a false effort from Mothrax. His motivation does not seem pro-town to me in the least. Hence, my vote is on Mothrax.
Also Mariyta, not having your vote on someone suggests that you are being cautious. Scum have a lot more incentive to be cautious than town.
Xvart is rapidly rising on my suspect list. His post 268 shows a lot of buddying and not much real scum-hunting. I would support an Xvart lynch if Mothrax won't be lynched.
mothrax wrote:There be scum on this wagon!Votecount wrote:4 ~ Mariyta (Vi, inHimshallibe, Zorblag, gandalf5166)
$20 on gandalf
Reasons:
A1) his vote on Mariyta is pure 100% hipocracy: He claims she has done nothing of note other than complain about his fakeclaim(not disputing that),yet if you look at his iso, 8 of 14 posts are about his fake claim.
B2) The rest of his posts are throwing out suspicions of 4 different players yet doing nothing to back them up. Town make cases as to why someone is scum, not just sit there and say "Person A is scum" and ride the wagon. Hell, even nocase has presented more of a case at this point.
C3) When voting Mariyta, he admits to blatant bandwagoning... check his post right before his vote, he litterally says "I'm going to see if this case has any merit" and jumps on the wagon.
therefor:
Unvote; Vote: gandalf5166
Mod edit: Fixed the quote tag.
mothrax wrote:
Prob-town:
Vi - no scum reason to claim what she did when she did. If what she said is true she dies tonight anyways and we will see with the flip. Also has taken a strong pro-town hunting role
inhim - i don't see scum motivation for coming forth with his role information when he did. It is also not a role that I could see benifiting scum. It is also easily confirmable.
nocase- confirmed daykiller, and I did have a strong town read on him, but he is probably the closest to unsure atm in this group.
zorblag- has moved to the unsure catagory. My townread was mostly gut and his ability seems to be town sofar but untill we get more answers I won't know for sure.
unsure- both of these were here mainly because I needed to reread them... both are leaning scum imo
uite- Uite has failed to take a stance on most things, and appears very wishy-washy in thread.
xvart - I don't believe his claim one bit.
prob scum
gandalf - moved into unsure in recent posts... will wait to see what seraphim has to say as well
tanstalas- tansscum busses. Uberbusses.