Yeah I think you were around when I got offered a leading position at a social media company, which I then declined to get a job instead.
Why the vote ?
You didn‘t spell it with capital A so I suggest you cover up your windows or one of them might start shooting rockets into your bedroom.
That‘s how badly people want me to hostIn post 16, DarthPunk wrote: It would be pretty funny if you got day 1 lynched again on another site though in a tragic kind of way
I could get behind this vote. I don`t see where the assumption I was scared came from if not from within.
What happened to your white knight badge, did you get too close to an octopus ?In post 21, Dannflor wrote: Having joined this game specifically to play with outoforder I would rather not eliminate them for the lolz.
Nope. Give me a good reason to be.In post 22, Dannflor wrote:you don't?In post 20, Vivax wrote: I don`t see where the assumption I was scared came from if not from within.
Is that how you want to be perceived ? Our goals differ then.In post 28, Dannflor wrote:im scaryIn post 26, Vivax wrote:Nope. Give me a good reason to be.In post 22, Dannflor wrote:you don't?In post 20, Vivax wrote: I don`t see where the assumption I was scared came from if not from within.
How to conf bias in two simple steps: Vote first, find reasons later.In post 47, Dannflor wrote: it would make it much easier to start getting firm reasons
No, just big on the fingersIn post 74, SuperfluousNinja wrote:Are you one of those "big on the acronyms" people :SIn post 46, Vivax wrote: This is IML. As soon as a majority is reached, the lunch is served. Drumming for quick votes is more mafia indicative than town indicative. We don‘t have enough information.
Consider this a FoS on Dannflor.
I don`t even think it´s a good post so I´d disagree with DP. What´s townie about wanting to force a vote on yourself? If everybody played like that we`d never find mafia.In post 70, SuperfluousNinja wrote:This feels a little all over the place. The "this was their best post" already tripped my wires since the game is, like, 3 pages old. That's like saying the second verse of the first song of Taylor Swift's new album is the best part of the album while you're listening to it for the first time ever.In post 57, DarthPunk wrote:This was dann’s best post imoIn post 49, Dannflor wrote:now, why isn't this a vote instead of an FoSIn post 46, Vivax wrote: This is IML. As soon as a majority is reached, the lunch is served. Drumming for quick votes is more mafia indicative than town indicative. We don‘t have enough information.
Consider this a FoS on Dannflor.
I’m bothered by all the other stuff but maybe that is normal here?
I’m trying to be a bit careful not to jump all over someone for not meeting my high expectations.
But then there's an attempted takesies-backsies with the "I'm trying to be careful" thing. If you want to be careful, it seems like a first sensible step would be to not try and summarize such a small sample size of material.
I don´t view myself as above DP, we´re used to doing things differently. I like having him around cause he´s good at keeping my sanity in check, and I just pretend to be his angry chihuahua.In post 85, Dannflor wrote: vivax is there a reason you didn't explain random voting stage to your friend
You isolated one of DP‘s posts to write about what you didn‘t like about it but it seemed to me you ignored the context in which it originated. Felt like you tried to pick out one of the posts to generate content instead of looking at the interactions as a whole.In post 97, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 87, Vivax wrote: VOTE: Dannflor
All things considered, seems like the best vote to me currently.
I´m a bit wary of superflousnjnja´s way of interceding between Dann and DP here, felt like a very safe entrance to make.
I don't really follow this logic. What is safe about taking a side in an ongoing conflict at this stage?
No.In post 117, outoforder wrote: Do you really think i am mafia Vivax?
Do you have any clear allegiances with anyone, in your opinion ? You initiated a suspicion arc on DP in a hit-and-run manner.In post 120, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 104, Vivax wrote:You isolated one of DP‘s posts to write about what you didn‘t like about it but it seemed to me you ignored the context in which it originated. Felt like you tried to pick out one of the posts to generate content instead of looking at the interactions as a whole.In post 97, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 87, Vivax wrote: VOTE: Dannflor
All things considered, seems like the best vote to me currently.
I´m a bit wary of superflousnjnja´s way of interceding between Dann and DP here, felt like a very safe entrance to make.
I don't really follow this logic. What is safe about taking a side in an ongoing conflict at this stage?
But why should the context matter? It's not like a waffle-y, "oh maybe don't take me so seriously" type of comment is suddenly less scummy just because it fits into something, yeah? The whole point of a tell is that you're able to discern things from it, REGARDLESS of the context. Tells should be things that stand on their own and stick out to you, regardless of what people try to bury it in, yeah?
But yeah, I was curious if you were going to bring this one up, and I see that you did...
Yeah. THIS is just nonsense. Why would an alleged scum version of myself want to make such clear lines in the sand when day 1 was, for me at least, less than an hour old? Like I know yall were talking while I was getting my beauty sleep, but the idea that I was actually trying to choose sides this early is just not logical. The LAST thing any scum ever wants to do, like ever, and much less at the very very beginning of the game, is have any clear allegiance with anyone. So this theory of yours seems like poor theorycrafting IMO.Maybe as a means to endear you to one side of the discussion while appearing active.
I especially like the conclusion of this post, ninja can be town.In post 132, SuperfluousNinja wrote:You made a legitimate point about how scum are more likely to take things seriously.In post 96, Dannflor wrote: UNVOTE: welp i got nothing from all that except a stronger confidence in DarthPunk as town
Darth argued with you at length about how random voting stage is rather silly, that each and every vote should be taken seriously. In other words, they made a case for why scum might take things seriously and created a space where their actions seem more understandable. They effectively tried to remove this strategy of yours to suspect people if they take things too seriously, which IMO is a totally valid strategy and your logic is sound, which now helps scum look less suspicious in this game if they overreact to things. Darth dispelled a totally valid point you made about something town could use to help find scum.
Your reaction to this was to forgive Darth and back off. Is that not, like, a bit odd? Aren't you concerned that Darth could be playing you here?
I didn‘t wait, it‘s how I found the thread when I opened it.In post 59, Luca Blight wrote:In post 20, Vivax wrote:I could get behind this vote. I don`t see where the assumption I was scared came from if not from within.
VOTE: OutofOrder
(Hey DP, I think they`re trying to tell us we have to vote for him. I´m not sure but these people might be a cannibal tribe)
Why did you wait for someone else to vote first if you found this suspect from Outoforder?
It‘s a terrible reason and you wanting to read town into it makes you suspicious.In post 190, outoforder wrote:This is probably the worst reason ever to vote for anyone, but also not mafia reason lolIn post 185, gob wrote: Lets discuss something important...
Roden voted Vivax
Naerys voted OoO
Dannfloor Vivax
Vivax OoO
These are the first votes in the game. Generally mafia wants to establish distancing earlier.
Roden and Dann voted Vivax.
Naerys voted OoO
Vivax voted OoO.
Given that Vivax was voted twice and also voted for someone, they are the person who gives the most info, and is the most likely to be wolf as well.
VOTE: Vivax
It's funny that you acknowledge this and think it's scummy, but somehow are oblivious to outoforder giving him a townread for it while you don't. If you are town then what does that make outoforder, or me for that matter?In post 212, Oatsmaster wrote:Its ridiculous that yall let gob get away with this tbh.In post 185, gob wrote: Lets discuss something important...
Roden voted Vivax
Naerys voted OoO
Dannfloor Vivax
Vivax OoO
These are the first votes in the game. Generally mafia wants to establish distancing earlier.
Roden and Dann voted Vivax.
Naerys voted OoO
Vivax voted OoO.
Given that Vivax was voted twice and also voted for someone, they are the person who gives the most info, and is the most likely to be wolf as well.
VOTE: Vivax
I know im using ridiculous a lot, but this is an insanely terrible post
He said gob‘s post was so bad that it made him town.In post 215, Oatsmaster wrote:how does outoforder giving him a town read make outoforder scum rather than bad?In post 214, Vivax wrote:It's funny that you acknowledge this and think it's scummy, but somehow are oblivious to outoforder giving him a townread for it while you don't. If you are town then what does that make outoforder, or me for that matter?In post 212, Oatsmaster wrote:Its ridiculous that yall let gob get away with this tbh.In post 185, gob wrote: Lets discuss something important...
Roden voted Vivax
Naerys voted OoO
Dannfloor Vivax
Vivax OoO
These are the first votes in the game. Generally mafia wants to establish distancing earlier.
Roden and Dann voted Vivax.
Naerys voted OoO
Vivax voted OoO.
Given that Vivax was voted twice and also voted for someone, they are the person who gives the most info, and is the most likely to be wolf as well.
VOTE: Vivax
I know im using ridiculous a lot, but this is an insanely terrible post
Considering we think the same it's odd that you think I'm scummy but manage to overlook the entire reason that I'm voting him for yet is one you seem to be agreeing with.
If he's mafia though I congratulate you to what later will be a present scumclaim.
Wow I can hold 2 separate thoughts in my head big whoop lol.
I'm curious now about the verse you mentioned.In post 70, SuperfluousNinja wrote:This feels a little all over the place. The "this was their best post" already tripped my wires since the game is, like, 3 pages old. That's like saying the second verse of the first song of Taylor Swift's new album is the best part of the album while you're listening to it for the first time ever.In post 57, DarthPunk wrote:This was dann’s best post imoIn post 49, Dannflor wrote:now, why isn't this a vote instead of an FoSIn post 46, Vivax wrote: This is IML. As soon as a majority is reached, the lunch is served. Drumming for quick votes is more mafia indicative than town indicative. We don‘t have enough information.
Consider this a FoS on Dannflor.
I’m bothered by all the other stuff but maybe that is normal here?
I’m trying to be a bit careful not to jump all over someone for not meeting my high expectations.
But then there's an attempted takesies-backsies with the "I'm trying to be careful" thing. If you want to be careful, it seems like a first sensible step would be to not try and summarize such a small sample size of material.
I think DP calling the vote terrible was because at the time it didn't look like Dann had any reason to place it at all from a townie point of view. He came into the thread voting for me, DP interceded, they both said they went into this game specifically to play with player X/Y (being me/OOO). This explanation misses the mark.In post 76, Dannflor wrote:I thought it was a little bit weird that outoforder took my original post about them seriously. I also found the "Im not too sure of anything yet" to be overly noncommittalIn post 71, DarthPunk wrote:Specifically, what is good about it and why did you make it?In post 69, DarthPunk wrote:How is it not?In post 66, Dannflor wrote: to be specific i would like you to to spell out why you think that vote is terrible
but I wanted to see what people would assume of my vote if I left out the explanation
If you look at Gob in thread context, he's mostly around placing votes seemingly at random. He'd be an irk to mafia who are trying hard to appear normal. The vote on Dannflor makes OOO scumread him, but the poor contrived explanation for the vote on me makes OOO townread him. Doesn't make sense to me.In post 151, outoforder wrote:In post 92, DarthPunk wrote: If Random voting is some part of the metagame here then that is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.this guy is probably mafia #2
We can vote him for it. In his defense though, that's how he's learned to play.In post 308, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 259, Oatsmaster wrote:Why is your reading comprehension so bad you need me to spell it out for you?In post 256, Roden wrote: And why are you so scared of revealing information about who you are as a player?
For real though, this is incredibly rude and I hope this isn't how people plan on treating each other in this game.
Luca repeatedly pointed out that OoO switched up his tone to a more aggressive demeanor, he also pointed it out for Roden.In post 319, gob wrote: We need to lim between Naerys / Vivax / SuperflousNinja
OutofOrder's tone has been consistent since the begining of the game. He also did progress the first page on his own pretty much.
SuperflousNinja's posts are really long and kinda void of anything worthwhile (in my opinion). So I am thinking she could also be mafia. Naerys not really sure on.
Honestly you remind me of one of those peasants from Monty Python.
You don‘t find it funny that DP thought he was rayn ?In post 364, Oatsmaster wrote: I would also like people to explain why they are voting for OoO
I don't think it was strategically wise for you to place Dannflor in the top tier town here and calling his arguments good when he's voting for you. If it's some kind of reverse psychology thing, Gob already took the spot for being in charge for that.In post 413, SuperfluousNinja wrote:I'll just copy and paste the notes I keep on my desktop.In post 410, DarthPunk wrote: Ninja can you post a list of your reads please.
TOWN
Luca Blight - active, good take in post 56
Dannflor - very active. Strangely aggressive? but still making good arguments
Oatsmaster - aggressive pushback on Roden, being a jerk, which is kinda townie tell
NULL
Outoforder - active, but acting in odd and suspicious ways, need better explanations
DarthPunk - very active, Post 57 struck me as sus and I commented on it
Vivax - very active, Back and forth with him over DarthPunk comment, but untrustworthy
Naerys - inactive
Hu Tao - inactive
SCUM
Gob - slightly more active but underwhelming, some bizarre play with the case on Vivax
Roden - was inactive, then strangely aggressive after I pushed him for it, defensive / dismissive
Dunnstral - inactive for a long period, pushed back on my activity level post
MalcolmTucker is afk so they could be anything.
It's a bit of a site meta thing. What you might define as scummy could just be a way to play that you don't deem as efficient. It always helps to pretend that there's a bunch of Chezinus in the game (troll player from our site).In post 431, DarthPunk wrote: What happens if the people that are acting scummy are just scum though? Occam's Razor and all that.
Great now this game sounds like a session of alcoholics anonymousIn post 459, DarthPunk wrote:Sorry, it really wasn't intentional and I have been trying.In post 458, Gypyx wrote:In post 455, DarthPunk wrote:I like a Ninja lynch better than a Luca lynch to be honest.In post 452, outoforder wrote: I really take issue of ninja basically accusing me of not knowing my own alignment...
Luca to me just seems to be freely posting whatever thoughts they happen to have at the time.
I don't think inconsistencies in thought processes arepurelya mafia trait tbh.
Townies can do it too, cause they are just posting whatever pops into their heads.While i understeand being used to using the word Lynch, i am officially asking that you take more caution in choosing your words
Its a habit formed over 15 years.
In post 70, SuperfluousNinja wrote:This feels a little all over the place. The "this was their best post" already tripped my wires since the game is, like, 3 pages old. That's like saying the second verse of the first song of Taylor Swift's new album is the best part of the album while you're listening to it for the first time ever.In post 57, DarthPunk wrote:This was dann’s best post imoIn post 49, Dannflor wrote:now, why isn't this a vote instead of an FoSIn post 46, Vivax wrote: This is IML. As soon as a majority is reached, the lunch is served. Drumming for quick votes is more mafia indicative than town indicative. We don‘t have enough information.
Consider this a FoS on Dannflor.
I’m bothered by all the other stuff but maybe that is normal here?
I’m trying to be a bit careful not to jump all over someone for not meeting my high expectations.
But then there's an attempted takesies-backsies with the "I'm trying to be careful" thing. If you want to be careful, it seems like a first sensible step would be to not try and summarize such a small sample size of material.
I'm curious about this approach that I didn't like at glance back then. It felt like a very safe, scumhunty post to make but is also a bit too much out to get DP at that early stage.In post 72, SuperfluousNinja wrote: To summarize and make my point a little clearer, I generally find statements like "well don't take what I said too seriously" to be scummy.
This response from him is unusually tame in my opinion. It's like it didn't bother him as much as it should have that Ninja was insta-scumreading him for not wanting to overcommit to the little information he had. Especially the 'attempted takseybacksies'-part implies that Ninja should have a strong scumread on him because she automatically assumes he's trying to weasel himself out of something, but there's not really a followup to her DP read, instead she switches to going after OOO afterwards.In post 75, DarthPunk wrote:I tend to agree in general. In this instance I was referencing specifically coming from a different site with a heavily cultivated metagame and finding it a bit jarring playing when I don’t understand others expectations and weird random shit is happening that I would usually not expect is going on.In post 72, SuperfluousNinja wrote: To summarize and make my point a little clearer, I generally find statements like "well don't take what I said too seriously" to be scummy.
Yeah mine didn‘t work either so I carpeted half a page.In post 493, outoforder wrote: Gonna put my vote here for now.
VOTE: Naerys
Complete lackluster today.
As a side note, how do spoilers actually work here? They seem to be not working correctly in my mind.
I like how DP got the probs town spot though lol.In post 461, DarthPunk wrote:Why do you always hedge on me being town.In post 460, outoforder wrote: Anyways here is where i basically stand at the moment:
Town:
Dannflor
Vivax
Oatsmaster
gob
Roden
Probs town:
DarthPunk
Scummers be here:
Luca Blight
Dunnstral
Naerys
SuperfluousNinja
Hu Tao
Replaced:
MalcolmTucker
My problem is, while Dann's case on Ninja is good and reasonably sound, currently pretty much all of my scum pool agree with that.
So basically i am either very wrong, or if Ninja is mafia, there's probably one mafia agreeing with the case and then the Malcolm slot.
I have some reservations, but i would like to wait for Ninja to give her opinion on what Dann said, before going deeper on this.
I‘d have Dunn, DP , OOO and Oats in lean scum currently. Others lean town except for Malcolm.In post 538, Dannflor wrote: for transparency, im somewhere around here right now:
TOWN: Luca Blight, outoforder, Oatsmaster
LEAN TOWN: gob, Hu Tao, SuperfluousNinja
MIXED/NULL: Dunnstral, Naerys, MalcolmTucker, Roden
LEAN SCUM: Vivax
SCUM: DarthPunk
Mate if I wrote what you did in that time span I‘d need a five week vacation not just a shower.In post 503, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Okay, I need a shower lol.
Oats mostly from his abrasiveness and the whole stuff I already explained surrounding the way he handled gob who I saw as lunch bait at the time.In post 608, DarthPunk wrote:Vivax can you explain your lean scum reads on Me, Oats and OOO.In post 607, Vivax wrote:Mate if I wrote what you did in that time span I‘d need a five week vacation not just a shower.In post 503, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Okay, I need a shower lol.
Like honestly why in the fudge did this warrant a townread, I got the opposite vibes.In post 107, outoforder wrote:You can be townIn post 70, SuperfluousNinja wrote:This feels a little all over the place. The "this was their best post" already tripped my wires since the game is, like, 3 pages old. That's like saying the second verse of the first song of Taylor Swift's new album is the best part of the album while you're listening to it for the first time ever.In post 57, DarthPunk wrote:This was dann’s best post imoIn post 49, Dannflor wrote:now, why isn't this a vote instead of an FoSIn post 46, Vivax wrote: This is IML. As soon as a majority is reached, the lunch is served. Drumming for quick votes is more mafia indicative than town indicative. We don‘t have enough information.
Consider this a FoS on Dannflor.
I’m bothered by all the other stuff but maybe that is normal here?
I’m trying to be a bit careful not to jump all over someone for not meeting my high expectations.
But then there's an attempted takesies-backsies with the "I'm trying to be careful" thing. If you want to be careful, it seems like a first sensible step would be to not try and summarize such a small sample size of material.
Yeah while being under pressure.In post 630, DarthPunk wrote: I got the sense that he was just handing out shitty nothing town reads at the time, he gave one to Dann too that I also didn't really understand or take seriously.
Shortly afterwards he also towned me ignoring that our conclusions were the polar opposite.In post 113, outoforder wrote: Vivax prolly town too
Dannflor ejected thread for a while without answering this question, at the time.In post 103, Luca Blight wrote:In post 102, Dannflor wrote: I just didn't feel like my vote on outoforder was very well placed after talking to both you and DarthPunk
aside from that it was largely for show, i wanted to share where my reads were at
Does that mean you've changed your opinion on outoforder?
Does anyone agree with this ? At the time it was very early in the game and the way OOO went about it felt very antsy, like he was forcing a solve when he should know that information will flow into the thread naturally. It's like he was spamming for a while blasting out a few townreads, called it solving and because Luca didn't do it in the same way he was scum.In post 154, outoforder wrote: Luca is just commenting, they are not trying to solve.
Marv is usually big on evaluating post timing and he's called me scum for evading questions a few times (correctly at that) or because my response was too delayed. I think that was big part of our site culture, being APM-fetishists in a strategy game and all.In post 637, DarthPunk wrote:i'm not sure Dann is town.In post 634, Vivax wrote:Dannflor ejected thread for a while without answering this question, at the time.In post 103, Luca Blight wrote:In post 102, Dannflor wrote: I just didn't feel like my vote on outoforder was very well placed after talking to both you and DarthPunk
aside from that it was largely for show, i wanted to share where my reads were at
Does that mean you've changed your opinion on outoforder?
Maybe I should just sheep Luca.
I liked the fact he wrote that case on ninja, but he didn't really do anything with it, and now he has a case on me he is not really doing anything with.
Seems to me he is attacking big voices ITT and then not really achieving anything and I am not sure he actually cares about determining our alignments as much as he cares about the fact he wrote a case.
Like cases are fine, but where is the follow up pressure/ questioning? He just doesn't seem invested or curious beyond his like big case post and for the confidence that he seems to have, lack of follow up is a big big red flag.
None of those are my scumreads though, and Dunn is a weak one based on almost nothing so I doubt I'm going to be voting into what you're suggesting.In post 643, DarthPunk wrote:I said at the start of the game I didn't want to lim anyone from TL right away.In post 640, Vivax wrote:Marv is usually big on evaluating post timing and he's called me scum for evading questions a few times (correctly at that) or because my response was too delayed. I think that was big part of our site culture, being APM-fetishists in a strategy game and all.In post 637, DarthPunk wrote:i'm not sure Dann is town.In post 634, Vivax wrote:Dannflor ejected thread for a while without answering this question, at the time.In post 103, Luca Blight wrote:In post 102, Dannflor wrote: I just didn't feel like my vote on outoforder was very well placed after talking to both you and DarthPunk
aside from that it was largely for show, i wanted to share where my reads were at
Does that mean you've changed your opinion on outoforder?
Maybe I should just sheep Luca.
I liked the fact he wrote that case on ninja, but he didn't really do anything with it, and now he has a case on me he is not really doing anything with.
Seems to me he is attacking big voices ITT and then not really achieving anything and I am not sure he actually cares about determining our alignments as much as he cares about the fact he wrote a case.
Like cases are fine, but where is the follow up pressure/ questioning? He just doesn't seem invested or curious beyond his like big case post and for the confidence that he seems to have, lack of follow up is a big big red flag.
Him evading Luca's question there reminded me of that. I'm not sure why you're blocking me off on OOO but I think I'm moving Dann back out of the town pile.
I also never want to lim strong townies day one period, unless its really obvious/strong case. its just - EV over time.
If you want me to vote for OOO you will need to provide more evidence.
Like it would be crazy to elim him over roden or gob or dunn right now.
Oats is the tide and he is the rock. Oats is the beagle and Roden is the eagle. One is one with the wolf, and the other prefers to play golf.In post 644, DarthPunk wrote:Can you point out how that isn't scummy lol?In post 642, Vivax wrote: If you read P11 and think Roden is scum then you should replay the tutorial
Like what am I missing here? is it some emotional congruence argument?
it seemed to me he just decided to attack someone and then went all out without really believing what he was saying. It came off as very fake to me.
Can you consider a world in which oats is town, what does this interaction look like in that world?
Sounding consistently righteous is hard for scum to pull off but it‘s what the majority of his posts sound like.In post 650, DarthPunk wrote: I really don’t see whatever it is you are seeing in that interaction vivax. Roden’s play looks like exactly what I would as mafia in that circumstance.
In post 205, Hu Tao wrote:Why? I think they are overreacting right nowIn post 159, Dannflor wrote: outoforder can be town
In post 204, Hu Tao wrote:So you're expecting someone to solve in the 5 pages? Also why was his question not trying to solve?In post 154, outoforder wrote: Luca is just commenting, they are not trying to solve.
In post 203, Hu Tao wrote:Seems like a bit of a stretch. I don't see what makes Luca scummy. Especially for asking a question that makes senseIn post 147, outoforder wrote: lets murder mafia ok?