And not only just there.Starbuck wrote:Vote: ReaperCharlie
Because Reapers are scum in the Supernatural Universe
Actually, everywhere.
And not only just there.Starbuck wrote:Vote: ReaperCharlie
Because Reapers are scum in the Supernatural Universe
I concur. She getsmolestargazer wrote:Hunt: Starbuckfor starting this bad habit which is clearly scum-motivated to stop us from ever lynching someone.
Nonononono, "Nox" is a Harry Potter spell, to turn off "Lumos".Midnight's Sorrow wrote:GUYS! GUYS!
We have our first lie~
Its Nox, not Konata~
Bandwagon is a go~
What a blatant lie. His avatar told you to VOTE robocopter, not HUNT him.animorpherv1 wrote:Hunt: Robocopter
his avatar told me to.
If you did... you'd want to policy lynch him even harder than chronoBenmage wrote:@RCChrono is a viable policy. No to sorrow, don't know about Blaze.
WIFOMChronopie wrote:- Significantly more often than not, I'm town (like 85:15)
WIFOMChronopie wrote:- I'm usually vanilla
this is your own fault.Chronopie wrote:- I have a clear history of beingmislynchbait.
and you provide yetChronopie wrote:I mean, I know I'm not the bestScumDemon-hunter
Midnight's Sorrow wrote:@RC:
0.o Wth did I ever do you to incite that reaction?
You say "the town" like you aren't part of us.LynchMePls wrote:This is actually a really great point. This information could be useful to the town, so they should provide it.Benmage wrote:As town we generally don't have a lot at our disposal. Information is our greatest tool and we'll need as much as possible. Resistance in this arena is scummy.
Hi robo, I added you so you wouldn't feel left out. There's a club, see?Robocopter87 wrote:Can we stop with the RC thing for being ReaperCharlie. I know thats his acronym originally but its kinda confusing for me. Can't we call him Reaper for one game?
Yeah... pretty muchMagnaofIllusion wrote:So you got to the trouble of attacking Ani for incorrectly parsing Robo’s avatar when Hunting is this game’s mechanic and then immediately make a fail Hunt on Ani? Interesting.Reaper wrote:What a blatant lie. His avatar told you to VOTE robocopter, not HUNT him.
Unvote; Vote: animorpherv1
Bam. This.Benmage wrote:Damn did I like post 125, especially this snip. I do agree that policing early is the way to go. It often just spurs into discussion. Policing mid-game more or less occurs when the acts of the initial desired policy unfold. So if we were going to policy lynch someone like chrono for poor play and lurking habits, but choose not to, and his gameplay turns out to be exactly that: poor play/lurking then we are lynching based on gameplay but it could for some be construed as a mid-game policy lynch.MagnaofIllusion wrote: You policy lynch, if at all, early because there is a general lack of information. Once the game is several Days deep you should be lynching on gameplay and gameplay alone.
IMO this part of your post is WIFOM. I've seen many players (namely, Jack) play suuuuper-obstinate before, while simultaneously being the towniest townie that ever towned.Benmage wrote:Obstinant players are anti-town and more often than not, scum.
Looks like we have a VI here. Which is one of the reasons I wanted a policy lynch. Omfg, if you saw how BlazezRb played in [ongoing game reference redacted], you'd totally know what I was talking about. Seriously. Go look at BlazezRb's past games. W. T. F.BlazezRb wrote:Wow, my shotgun and trying to understand this conversation is giving me a headache.
Is hydrak and Genarichhydra both hydras?
You acted like that long after you were dead tooMidnight's Sorrow wrote:If your talking about Obvscurm. obviously I acted that way so I could get votes so I could use my ability ....
LynchMePls wrote:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.ReaperCharlie wrote:You say "the town" like you aren't part of us.LynchMePls wrote: This is actually a really great point. This information could be useful to the town, so they should provide it.
igmeoy
ReaperCharlie wrote:hmmmm... i must have forgotten to use [sarcasm] tags...
i guess they didn't make the port over from phpbb2, sry
Ok, so you are ready to drop it then, but when Starbuck comes up and says:LynchMePls wrote:Oh, well, you know sarcasam and the interwebz... they are mortal enemies.
Then all of a sudden you think its oooOOOoooo! suspicious! once again.Starbuck wrote:I didn't get that feeling. This feels to be like you are trying to put suspicion where there really is none.ReaperCharlie wrote:You say "the town" like you aren't part of us.LynchMePls wrote: This is actually a really great point. This information could be useful to the town, so they should provide it.
KageLord wrote:Hunt: ReaperCharliefor having the best avatar in the thread... and for knowing the counterspell for Lumos. Burn the witch!
LOL!molestargazer wrote:Hunt: KageLord
There's insufficient evidence to burn him. Does he weigh the same as a duck?
Because generally even as town he ends up being more of a hindrance to the town than a help, either for some bad reasoning on his part, or by picking the wrong (subjective) person to perform night actions on, and then coming to the wrong (objective) conclusions about what results his night actions yielded, etc. For a shining example, check out Mini 979: Square Enix II: Siege of Obscurum. He came to a terrible conclusion that cleared the godfather for the entire remainder of the game, and the scum coasted on to a perfect victory, riding mostly on Chronopie's mistake in a crucial circumstance.molestargazer wrote:NONE of which affect your randomly assigned role choice in this game. That's saying "don't lynch me because there's more town than there are scum so you're probably going to hit town".Chronopie wrote:- Significantly more often than not, I'm town (like 85:15)
- I'm usually vanilla
- I have a clear history of being mislynch bait.
That said, I'm generally against policy lynches - could someone please explain why a policy lynch on Chronopie would happen?
So yeah... two reasons why he's an awesome lynch.Chronopie wrote:I don't understand why I'd make a good policy lynch.
- Significantly more often than not, I'm town (like 85:15)
- I'm usually vanilla
- I have a clear history of being mislynch bait.
This never got answered... Midnight's Sorrow just went and voted for someone else instead of answering the question.LynchMePls wrote:This is the second time you've voted him, and in another post you specifically call him scum. He only has two posts. Are you still in RVS? If not, what exactly do you find scummy?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Hunt:KageLord
Yeah, it does seem like a useless argument, but you do bring up a good point. The amount Benmage pushed it began to catch my attention more and more as I read on.KageLord wrote:I personally don't really care if GH says who he/she/they is/are. I'm more interested in how much Benmage is pushing it. He does have a point about obstinate players, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say that GH is that much of a problem yet. If they are really set on not revealing that information, they must have some reason for it. I'm not sure if there would be more of a scum motive behind it than a town motive. This just seems like useless arguing to me.
I disagree. Entirely.LynchMePls wrote:That's exactly my point, it isn't a misrep at all. Which accounts make up the two heads of the hydra is more important to the game than which characters got which powers. Dismissing that the identities of the two heads could be useful information while saying you are more interested in the fluff seems scummy to me.KageLord wrote:Wow... I thought people had more common sense than this. By "I'm more interested", I meant that I am more interested in that than in finding out who GH is. Thanks for the misrep though.
Agreed.Benmage wrote:It is often the case that scum are given safeclaims. And farside is an experienced girl. Name claiming is a bad idea.
Yes. I agree.jmj3000 wrote:Ok, so my thoughts so far: most of this game has been focused on finding out who the two heads of GH are. Treat the account as what it is named after: a creature with two heads that have separate minds sharing one body. All finding out the heads of the hydra are will accomplish is helping establish two metas that are more than likely being played against. They aren't going to reveal themselves, they have stated their reasons why, let it go. For continuing to ask for their identities, both Benmage and Starbuck have earned my wary eyes on them and their posts.
I wouldn't know, but you sound like you know what you're talking about. I'd sheep ya.jmj3000 wrote:Now, about what KageLord said: why be so interested in the characters put into the game? I can think of at least 10 different characters off the top of my head, but due to events in the show, not a single one of them can be confirmed town or scum just by us knowing their name. Let us find out what characters were included through lynches and deaths, not speculation.
I don't quite agree with you here. Both are indicative of newbie play as well as scum play, and looking at his join date, I don't get the vibe that he's a grizzled veteran of forum mafia. But... indirect semi-defense of KageLord's newbiness aside, yes, these are valid scumtells when applied to more seasoned players. I just think he's too new to understand what he did wrong in suggesting holding off policy lynching. It doesn't exactly say much on the wiki page and there's not really any other way he could have learned about that in the 3 games he said he's played. Like I said earlier, I've still never seen a PL that's gone through.jmj3000 wrote:After looking at you in ISO, I see at least 2 things I really don't like about your posts: 1) the amount of WIFOM in your posts (noticeably the whole first paragraph of post 138) and 2) you saying we should hold off on the policy lynching until later.
There's a lot of long words in that sentence, I'm naught but a humble pirate!jmj3000 wrote:You sound like someone who got affronted when they didn't acquiesce to your request, so rather then try to persuade them, you attack them and try to build a case off of a simple no.
For those who are wondering what he means by this, there was a 2004 Harry Potter game where Harry, Ron, and Hermione were the Mafia. It was pretty epic, I assume. Way before I got here, but I went back and read it because it's a popular example of people doing just that: switching around roles to confuse the f*ck out of people.Chronopie wrote:I'd be inclined to guess that Farside would've either a) provided safe/fakeclaims and/or b) switched around roles (HP mafia anyone?) and/or c) inserted unusual roles to throw us off.
Yeap. This about sums it up. If anyone has anything further to say about this, speak now or forever hold your peace.GenericHydra wrote:The argument about our identities is ridiculous/a total waste of time. The Day only lasts 2 weeks (I'm accustomed to 3 week deadlines). I'm slightly dissapointed at Benmage for continuing to pursue the matter; I'd thought that it would end with jmj3000's #144. If youreallyhave issues with an anonymous hydra, send a PM to the mod.
Rule #6 of 'Applying Meta for Geeks': When applied to VIs, metagaming is never null, and should not be considered as such.BlazezRb wrote:2. This is based on meta, which isNULL.
Guess all you want, but someone will always prove you wrong. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.BlazezRb wrote:I'm guessing we are out of RVS
Um, case in point about the VI...BlazezRb wrote:ReaperCharlie wrote:1. Who the heck is Mistu?
2. W.T.F. waswhatfor?WOW!!
Wrong game. lol. ignore 1.
It is what it is.BlazezRb wrote:2. what was with theGuess all you want, but someone will always prove you wrong. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.about.
Loaded question?BlazezRb wrote:Real 1. Who do you think is town and scum?
Why is it such a big deal to you? Isn't that the whole point of a hydra?Benmage wrote:For me it is a big deal. I like to know who I'm dealing with, their experience level, if I've personally played with them before. Something to refer to is nice. However we are going no where in this discussion, so whatever...and your vote rocked *sarcasm*.Nero Cain wrote:To me, if we don't have meta for a certian player its no big deal.
Not really. I think it was scummy of LMP to do that, but I don't think it necessarily means anything about Starbuck. She was just late on the draw, and it's LMP that pinged my scumdar with that.MagnaofIllusion wrote:You went to all the quoting trouble multiple posts and come to no conclusion? This looks like an subtle attempt to paint LynchMe and Starbuck as scummy without outright supporting it.Reaper wrote:Seems like you just made a halfway joking case about a joking comment I made, knowing it'd fall through, but then when someone else picked up the scent, you pretended you were serious the first time. Hmmmmm....
That was a Smalltown, so... yea that made it a bit easier...MagnaofIllusion wrote:You had no problems identifying Town reads early on in Stardust Mafia. Why the reluctance here?Reaper wrote: Loaded question?
Real answer: Too early to tell ATP. Nobody's made any slips yet that I can see.
I'll have to read again. I didn't notice that... and I didn't notice you calling him out on it. Where?MagnaofIllusion wrote:Also what do you think of Kagelord's fence-sitting regarding a Chrono policy lynch that I previously highlighted?
This.MagnaofIllusion wrote:If history is any less easjo is just going to show up, say nothing in her posts, and lurk further. Hopefully she will not respond and can be replaced.
ReaperCharlie wrote:Seems like you (LMP) just made a halfway joking case about a joking comment I made, knowing it'd fall through, but then when someone else picked up the scent, you pretended you were serious the first time.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:You went to all the quoting trouble multiple posts and come to no conclusion? This looks like an subtle attempt to paint LynchMeand Starbuckas scummy without outright supporting it.
ReaperCharlie wrote:I think it was scummy of LMP to do that, butI don't think it necessarily means anything about Starbuck. She was just late on the draw, and it's LMP that pinged my scumdar with that.
First of all, I said nothing aboutLynchMePls wrote:Your attempt to paintSB and meas scum for pointing it out even doubly so.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:This looks like an subtle attempt to paint LynchMe and Starbuck as scummy
Noted.LynchMePls wrote:Your attempt to paint SB and me as scum
Ok, I can see that. Not really on purpose, and you're reading too much into it, but if you think non-committal things like that are of importance, let me ask you this:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Then why didn’t you outright call LMP scummy? Using “Hmmmm” as a proxy gives you an out to say you didn’t think he was should you need to at a later day (or it did until this conversation, anyway). Leaving yourself ‘breathing room’is not Pro-Town.Reaper wrote:Not really. I think it was scummy of LMP to do that, but I don't think it necessarily means anything about Starbuck. She was just late on the draw, and it's LMP that pinged my scumdar with that.
Speaking of which, you seem pretty confident... who are YOUR town reads?MagnaofIllusion wrote:You had no problems identifying Town reads early on in Stardust Mafia. Why the reluctance here?
Oh yeah now that you show me, I remember seeing it.MagnaofIllusion wrote:You will find it here.Reaper wrote:I'll have to read again. I didn't notice that... and I didn't notice you calling him out on it. Where?
It's not a backtrack to say you're being sarcastic.MagnaofIllusion wrote:I’ve gone back to read the exchange to get a full feeling of whether the situation is analogous, as you suggest. The sequence of events as I see it.
[quotes snipped]
You comment that LMP appears to be separating himself from Town (an accusation, however small, that he is scummy). He says it’s ridiculous. You back-track and say you were being sarcastic. He says sarcasm and the web ‘don’t mix’. I think he was pretty clear when he called your initial statement ridiculous, but he didn’t come out and directly say it was scummy. So in context it does warrant attention.
On the other hand your immediate back-track in saying you were being sarcastic when it doesn’t appear you were also appears scummy.
Uhhh... I forgot, duh. Why would I remember that? It wasn't important to my wincon then, and it isn't now. You were just some punk that got killed off early on in that game.MagnaofIllusion wrote:I think we had this discussion in Stardust … I don’t give explicit Town reads Day 1. I don’t believe in them. Now I have to decide if you truly forgot that or you are attempting to use that knowledge in a back-handed attack on me.Reaper wrote:Speaking of which, you seem pretty confident... who are YOUR town reads?
So what's the verdict? Is it scummy that I don't think things you think are scummy, are scummy?MagnaofIllusion wrote:And for the record – why I asked you in the first place is because your play here is suddenly very similar to your Day 1 Stardust play. Thus my interest has been piqued and I was curious how you would react to the question.
Those aren't weasel words, that's called an honest answer to what appears to be an honest question. I call them as I see them. Do you think I'm deliberately trying to pick and choose what things I think are scummy or not, so as to please others, like yourself? Please. Give me a break and get over yourself.MagnaofIllusion wrote:More weasel-wording from you. It’s interesting (which is again code for scummy) but not a huge tell. So you can go either way on it. And I’m curious how large a scum-tell you are expecting to see this early Day 1?Reaper wrote:To answer you: Yeah, I think it's interesting, but not necessarily a huge tell.
Seriously? ...crap.jmj3000 wrote:anyone with knowledge of the show knows that most of the characters have equal amounts of good and evil in them, and thus can be swayed at any time, not to mention possession.
But less scummy than KageLord being interested in the setup, I presume. At least, that's what I gather from looking at who you are Hunting.MagnaofIllusion wrote:I think his fence-sitting is blatantly scummy. Thus I called it that.
Well put.MagnaofIllusion wrote:I expect the scum-tells on Day 1 to be much smaller than any other Day. Day 1 scum-hunting is by nature going to be the hardest. The potential scum-tells will be the smallest as we have the least information to work from. I liken it to working on the small bit of puffy drywall you find. As you dig into it sometimes it is just puffy due to condensation. Sometimes there’s dry-rot and other damage beneath. But you aren’t going to find out if you don’t go digging.
*predicts in advance that Starbuck will inter-game OMGUS-tunnel on him just like Magna*Starbuck wrote:Just checking in, have had a busy couple of days and should be caught up between tonight and Saturday morning.
No. I am RC; you is Robo. Get it right before I come and gank your soul, sir.Robocopter87 wrote:animorhev, it would help if you said Reaper or Robo instead of RC.
shut your frickin face.animorpherv1 wrote:RC = Reaper, Robo = Robo.Robocopter87 wrote:animorhev, it would help if you said Reaper or Robo instead of RC.
Nero Cain wrote:The 'stache ALWAYS gives me away.ReaperCharlie wrote:My my my! How nice of all these people to drop by, check in, and/or otherwise announce their here-ness.
Please do us all a favor and read the thread (in its entirety, not skimming), and provide us with your top three suspects and/or points of interest in this format:
1. Apparently Nero Cain has a very suspicious mustache.
2. MagnaofIllusion is a large monster from Japan. Obvscum.
3. ReaperCharlie's avatar has kamina glasses. Lynch on sight.
And then preferably, a vote would be awesome too. It is also preferably that your vote be on one of your above suspects.
Love,
ReaperCharlie
I will go on record as saying that I totally agree with the first paragraph, as I think most players (besides Benmage and Starbuck) do. Pressing GH to reveal their heads is a worthless exercise.KageLord wrote:I personally don't really care if GH says who he/she/they is/are. I'm more interested in how much Benmage is pushing it. He does have a point about obstinate players, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say that GH is that much of a problem yet. If they are really set on not revealing that information, they must have some reason for it. I'm not sure if there would be more of a scum motive behind it than a town motive. This just seems like useless arguing to me.
You know, I'm more interested to find out which characters are here and what their role powers are. The quotes from the show so far have piqued my interest.
Apologies then.animorpherv1 wrote:I know that. I didn't see your post ahead of mine.ReaperCharlie wrote:shut your frickin face.animorpherv1 wrote:RC = Reaper, Robo = Robo.Robocopter87 wrote:animorhev, it would help if you said Reaper or Robo instead of RC.I am RC.This is final.
Please do. Calling anything town-v-town this early in the day in a large game definitely warrants some attention, and possibly some stiff suspicion.Benmage wrote:I can drop some further content too.
Oh, trust me. He's not acting.GenericHydra wrote:BlazezRb isn't really that active, I can't get a read on him now. I'm thinking that he's acting like a VI so far (like what ReaperCharlie said) and would like to see more from him before making solid conclusions.
Mostly inMidnight's Sorrow wrote:The whole Magna/Reaper clash just gave off scummy vibes, mostly in his direction.
How about later in the day? And whose posts are you saying scream pro-town?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:I don't really like assuming someone Pro-Town this early on D1, just because they post posts that scream it.
Instead of apologizing again for NOT scumhunting, why not just START, instead?KageLord wrote:Aye. As I admitted in my last post, I did have a lack of scum-hunting (I didn't say it so blatantly, but that was the gist). And as I said, I plan to remedy that.
Are you seriously trying to tell us what we should and shouldn't use against you? And I really don't dig the "but wait! so-and-so isn't scumhunting either! so-and-so is scummy too!!! " argument. Especially because it doesn't name names.KageLord wrote:Not sure that this is the best "tell" to use on me though. I'm not the only player that has shown a lack of scum-hunting...
Hmmm... hey Magna, care to explain why you felt it was prudent to misrepresent him just to further your own case?KageLord wrote:The second quote is just taken a bit out of context (and the wink smiley is removed).If I recall correctly, that was in response to RC (Reaper) pointing out that since my signature indicates my record is 0-2, perhaps I might not be the best judge of what's a good tell and what's not (at least, that's what I thought he was implying). Previously, I had said that the "tells" used against me so far had just been paranoia over minor things. This part was just a direct response to RC (Reaper) that I might at least be right in this case about the "paranoia tells".It was said somewhat seriously and somewhat jokingly, as indicated by the removed smiley.
Hi. We await your Wall-o-Text® with much anticipation. More outside of quotes than inside, preferably.KageLord wrote:... As said in that post, I intend to scum-hunt after rereading the thread. Scum-hunting with no leads wouldn't be very responsible of me, would it? That post was also to give the reason why I might not be posting much except to respond to direct attacks against me or to respond to major happenings, as I'm rereading the thread.
1. Why the h311 not?GroupThink wrote:1. I haven't read the thread yet.
2. I wouldn't discount that our scum is lurking.
3. I'd prefer to lynch one of our lurkers.
0_o ...For some reason I never got that from Stardust, though you'd think I'd pick up on that from the name. You serious?GroupThink wrote:I don't think it's important who GenericHydra really is; that's the point of having a hydra, to bypass the irritation of "meta".I mean, I'm one of three heads myself.I only use one at a time, though.
GroupThink wrote:I can honestly see why they would refuse. I also don't get why you would say you're a hydra in the first place. I did it to prove a point but there's really no reason to just say "I'm a hydra." Unless I'm missing something, which I commonly do.
lol... I think it's safe to say he meant 'read and post'.GroupThink wrote:Skeith'll read a post in a while. He didn't say he'd post anything, but he'll read somethin. In a while that is.skeith931 wrote:Just dropping by to say im here will read a post in a while
Dam# it. I didn't even see that... >.<GroupThink wrote:You know you just softclaimed 1-Shot Vig, right? Yeah, you pretty much fucked up now.Chronopie wrote:I mean, I know I'm not the bestScumDemon-hunter, but I'm still willing to take A Shot at it.
Dam# you, Jack Sparrow.GroupThink wrote:1. Okay, Ihaveread the thread.
2. I still think that our scum could be amongst the lurkers.
3. I'd still prefer it if we lynched one of the lurkers.
Yeah. That's the way Magna scumhunts. He twists things to make people look worse than they are, and then sees who will defend them, and/or if they will defend themselves; and then he looks for whether they're defending themselves on the right points and whether they're doing it from a pro-town standpoint or not. It's unorthodox, but it works like a daisy.Sawyer wrote:Whether he's scum hunted is neither here nor there in this argument. It's none of my concern in this argument, because I'm not defending him. I'm saying half of your scumhunting in your first real post, was about what Kage said. The rest was hardly anything. And that brings me back to how you used "not pro-town" to make him look worse, but like I said, that's in the past since you admitted that you think it's actually scummy.Magna wrote:Defending his lack of scum-hunting (which, BTW, has persisted for his entire ISO) by saying he is active lurking is a pretty bad argument to make.
Posting a fair amount != scumhunting. Your point?Sawyer wrote:He wasn't scumhunting before his attacks either and he's posting a fair amount so it seems.Magna wrote:For the record notice that since he’s come under fire by myself and others Kage hasn’t bothered to begin scum-hunting but just faded into the background. He’s certainly been active in other threads.
So start discussing things instead of waiting for everyone else to do your work for you. For pete's sake.animorpherv1 wrote:@GHroupThink:
I can't make any solid reads.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaa stop pretending like you saw it first. lmaoLynchMePls wrote:Why make it worse by pointing it out for any scum that may have missed the bread crumb?GroupThink wrote:You know you just softclaimed 1-Shot Vig, right? Yeah, you pretty much fucked up now.Chronopie wrote:I mean, I know I'm not the bestScumDemon-hunter, but I'm still willing to take A Shot at it.
Dude, I swear. People are so dense.Benmage wrote:Uhh no shit sherlock. Reapers vote looked like a rvs.GroupThink wrote:He's voting you because of the similarities of your names, right?Robocopter87 wrote:Lol, Benmage, asking what the initials would be. It would be BS. Lolz.
Also, Reaper that was the stupidest reason ever to vote me.Well, I still believe we'd be better off lynching a lurker.
Honestly, F%$^ING DROP IT. HYDRAS ARE MADE FOR ANONYMITY. THEY WANT TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS. WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT THAT?Benmage wrote:Honestly, do tell.GroupThink wrote:I can honestly see why they would refuse.
Maybe for the pure WIFOM of it. Idk. It probably wasn't a good idea either way...Benmage wrote:Why would you ever bring this to attention..??GroupThink wrote:You know you just softclaimed 1-Shot Vig, right? Yeah, you pretty much fucked up now.Chronopie wrote:I mean, I know I'm not the bestScumDemon-hunter, but I'm still willing to take A Shot at it.
Did you read the end of my post? Or did you just Ctrl+F it for your name?LynchMePls wrote:I'm not saying I saw it first, I'm saying why point it out? If he is bread crumbing his role, what pro-town reason is there to yell it out to everyone? Is it normal for townies to see bread crumbs and then just point them out? If I saw a bread crumb I'd keep my mouth shut, and only point it out later if the player contradicts it.ReaperCharlie wrote:Haaaaaaaaaaaaa stop pretending like you saw it first. lmao
ReaperCharlie wrote:So... what do you think of who's already posted?
Wellllll. I have to say 4 votes is hardly "overwhelming pressure" when there's 13 to lynch.Snow_Bunny wrote:rather go with a Kage wagon. If we take into account his request for replacement, which isusually a scum reaction when overwhelmed with pressure, we will have a nice scum lynch on D1.
I don't know if you ever caught this. This was indirectly a question. Please provide 'further content'.ReaperCharlie wrote:Please do. Calling anything town-v-town this early in the day in a large game definitely warrants some attention, and possibly some stiff suspicion.Benmage wrote:The magna v sawyer thing reads town v town to me...I'd like to hear some of the deserters comment on it. I can drop some further content too.
wtf?LynchMePls wrote:Wow, that's easy.
Unvote
Vote: KageLord